
Philippine call center jobs nearly doubled to 2 million over 10 years.
Unemployment fell in both the Philippines and India, suggesting AI hasn't displaced offshore workers.
An economist calls this Jevons paradox, where cheaper AI-driven work increases demand.
What happened
Apollo chief economist Torsten Slok reports that Philippine call center employment nearly doubled to 2 million from 2016 through 2025, rising every year. Meanwhile, unemployment in the Philippines fell from 9% to about 5% between 2021 and July 2026, and in India from around 7% to 6%.
Why it matters
Slok argues this contradicts the idea that AI is displacing white-collar workers, citing Jevons paradox: as AI makes call center work cheaper and faster, companies buy more of it. The Brookings Institution estimates 86% of customer service tasks have high automation potential, yet employment keeps growing.
What to watch
A 2023 study found an AI assistant boosted call center agent productivity by 14% per hour, suggesting AI may increase demand for these roles. Some experts, however, note AI still struggles with complex issues and that some companies value human interaction for brand reasons.
Ask the AI about this article →
The data from Apollo chief economist Torsten Slok highlights a paradox in the AI labor debate. While many expect AI to replace white-collar jobs, the Philippine call center industry has grown steadily, nearly doubling to 2 million employees from 2016 to 2025. Unemployment rates in both the Philippines and India have declined, suggesting that AI has not yet displaced offshore workers at scale. This aligns with historical patterns like Jevons paradox, where efficiency gains lead to increased demand rather than reduced consumption.
Some economists believe AI will continue to boost productivity and employment. A 2023 study found that AI tools increased call center agent productivity by 14% per hour, and earlier research showed AI translation boosted eBay exports. However, experts also point out limitations. AI may not handle complex issues well, and humans can experience cognitive overload. Some companies deliberately seek human agents for brand differentiation, offering a more personal touch.
The debate extends beyond call centers. A decade ago, AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton predicted radiologists would be replaced, but the number of radiologists in the U.S. has actually risen by 10%. This suggests that AI might augment rather than replace human labor in many fields, but the long-term trajectory remains uncertain.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Sony Music Group's publishing arm has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, alleging the AI company used songs fo…

A guide explains how AI agents can reduce work hours, labor and outsourcing costs, and rework from errors

Elon Musk warned that roughly 15 gigawatts of AI compute scheduled for next year may never get powered up in 2…

JetBrains announced Junie Local, a coding agent that runs entirely on a local machine

A new poll from Embold Research and Heatmap Pro shows 75% of Americans now oppose building AI data centers in…

A Pew Research Center survey of 3,488 U.S
