AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Regulation & PolicyAI Safety & AlignmentTechCrunch AIPublished: Sep 3, 2026, 04:01 JST1 min read

US sides with OpenAI in NYT copyright suit

US sides with OpenAI in NYT copyright suit

Key takeaway

  • The Trump administration filed a brief defending OpenAI in a copyright lawsuit.

  • The case questions whether AI training on copyrighted works is fair use.

  • The brief's influence remains to be seen.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The Trump administration filed a 20-page brief supporting OpenAI in a lawsuit brought by The New York Times over unlicensed use of copyrighted material to train LLMs.

  2. Why it matters

    The brief argues that constraining LLM development under a misunderstanding of fair use would hinder American prosperity, and it could carry weight in the ongoing legal debate over AI training.

  3. What to watch

    The brief is not a ruling, and the case is being tried in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where the administration lacks jurisdiction.

Ask the AI about this article →

Context & Analysis

The lawsuit, filed by The New York Times, centers on whether OpenAI's use of copyrighted material to train its LLMs is protected under fair use. The Trump administration's brief, referencing an executive order signed by President Trump last year, argues that the U.S. has a strong interest in maintaining leadership in AI and that a narrow reading of fair use would hinder progress. This intervention comes amid a broader legal debate where cases have largely been favorable to AI companies, such as the $1.5 billion settlement ordered against Anthropic for using illegal shadow libraries, not for the act of training itself. The brief is not a ruling, but it signals the government's stance and could influence the court's perspective, even though it lacks jurisdiction.

FAQ

What is the main argument in the Trump administration's brief?
The brief says the U.S. has a strong interest in retaining global leadership in AI, and that constraining LLM development under a misunderstanding of fair use doctrine would thwart progress and hinder American prosperity.
Has the court issued a ruling in this case?
No, the brief is not a ruling. The case is being tried in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Also reported by The Verge AI, WIRED AI

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Interactive Brokers bets on AI-assisted investingTop Companies AI · 2h ago
  • Google courts Hollywood with AI licensing dealsTop Companies AI · 2h ago
  • AI adoption in K-12 outruns school readiness, IBM survey findsTop Companies AI · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleTrinity AI guides disabled students' IEP planning