AIToday
AI Regulation & PolicyAI Business & IndustryITmedia AI+Published: Sep 10, 2026, 10:01 JST2 min read

Shadow AI use higher among managers at 46.5%, says AI白書2026

Shadow AI use higher among managers at 46.5%, says AI白書2026

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    In the AI White Paper 2026 survey, 46.5% of managers at section chief level and above reported using non-company-approved AI tools at work, compared with 38.1% of general employees.

  2. Why it matters

    Even at companies with company-wide AI guidelines, unauthorized AI tool use reached 46.9%, barely different from 50.0% at firms with partial rules, suggesting guidelines alone have not closed the gap.

  3. What to watch

    The survey suggests the issue hinges less on creating rules than on updating and operating them as conditions change, with 45.1% of firms that have company-wide guidelines saying rules cannot keep up.

WHO IT HITSCorporate compliance and IT governance teams responsible for AI policy will need to note that managers, not junior staff, are the heavier shadow AI users, and that existing guidelines have not eliminated unauthorized tool use.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The survey results, published by Yahoo! Asia Skills Research Institute on August 10, 2026, as part of its AI White Paper 2026, look at generative AI usage across large companies with at least 300 employees. The research institute surveyed 310 valid respondents between April 24 and 25, 2026, through an internet survey using a monitor panel.

The findings show that shadow AI — using AI tools for work without company approval — is more common among managers at section-chief level and above (46.5%) than among general employees (38.1%). This pattern is consistent with the finding that managers feel guidelines and rules cannot keep up with the pace of change at a higher rate (57.4%) than general employees (47.1%). The survey also found that even at companies with fully developed company-wide guidance, unauthorized AI tool use remained at 46.9%, nearly the same as at firms with partial rules (50.0%).

Looking ahead, the effectiveness of AI governance appears to hinge less on whether rules exist than on how quickly they are revised and operated. For compliance and IT teams, the challenge may be less about writing new guidelines and more about closing the gap between rule updates and the speed at which AI tools and use cases change.

FAQ
Who was surveyed in the AI White Paper 2026 investigation?
The survey covered managers at section-chief level or above and general employees at team-leader level or below, working at companies with 300 or more employees. Valid responses came from 310 people.
Does having company-wide AI guidelines reduce shadow AI use?
The survey found unauthorized AI tool use at 46.9% at firms with fully developed company-wide guidelines, versus 50.0% at firms with partial rules, showing little difference between them.
Why do managers use shadow AI more?
57.4% of managers said rules and guidelines cannot keep up with the pace of change, compared with 47.1% of general employees. This suggests delays in rule revisions may push managers toward unofficial tools.

Get the latest AI Regulation & Policy news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • New Mexico Supreme Court holds lawyer Stephen Aarons in contempt over AI-faked briefArs Technica AI · 7h ago
  • Mastercard, Visa, Ant pilot Know-Your-Agent for AI checkoutTop Companies AI · 10h ago
  • Finnish MP's question draws government reply on superintelligent AILessWrong AI · 11h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleNVIDIA, Australian partners plan 2-gigawatt DSX buildout by 2027