AIToday
Image GenerationITmedia AI+Published: Sep 8, 2026, 22:01 JST2 min read

Ibusuki Marathon organizer confirms AI in poster, corrects credit on Sept 8

Ibusuki Marathon organizer confirms AI in poster, corrects credit on Sept 8

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The organizer of the Ibusuki Marathon in Kagoshima confirmed on September 8 that generative AI was used to create its poster, following criticism on X that the canola flowers looked AI-generated.

  2. Why it matters

    The official site originally credited an 'illustrator' for the poster, but the organizer has now corrected this to say a 'graphic designer' produced it, acknowledging the description was inappropriate.

  3. What to watch

    The organizer apologized for the canola flower visuals differing from the real flower, citing insufficient checks during production and proofreading. Watch whether similar AI-use disclosures become standard for event posters.

WHO IT HITSEvent organizers who commission posters and other promotional materials are affected, as this case highlights the need for accurate credit and disclosure when AI tools are used in the creative process, to avoid public backlash.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The incident began when the Ibusuki Marathon's official website posted a poster on July 24, 2026, for the 44th race planned for January 2027. The poster featured canola flowers, which are part of the event's name, along with other local sights. Around September 7, users on X began noting that the flower visuals appeared different from reality, suggesting AI generation, despite the site's credit to an illustrator.

The organizer's September 8 statement serves as both a correction and a clarification. It revealed that generative AI was used, but emphasized that a graphic designer handled the composition, design, and image editing, resulting in the final visual. The statement also changed the credit from 'illustrator' to 'graphic designer,' admitting the original description was not accurate. Additionally, an apology was issued for the flower visuals, attributing the issue to insufficient checks during production and proofreading.

The episode likely highlights a growing expectation for transparency when AI tools are part of creative work. The test may be whether audiences accept AI-assisted design when the human role is clearly and accurately described, or whether any use of generative AI in promotional art will draw scrutiny. The organizer's own assessment that the poster captures the marathon's charm and Ibusuki's character suggests it stands by the final product, hoping the clarified process will address the backlash.

FAQ
Did the organizer originally deny using AI?
No, but the official site originally described the work as created by an illustrator. After criticism, the organizer clarified that a graphic designer used generative AI during the process and corrected the wording.
What was the specific criticism about the poster?
Critics on X pointed out that the canola flowers looked different from the real flower, suggesting AI had been used. The organizer acknowledged this and apologized for insufficient checks during production and proofreading.

Get the latest Image Generation news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Adobe's Premiere Overhaul: Generate Media Directly on TimelineThe Verge AI · 1h ago
  • AI food ads spark backlash; restaurants say they're temporaryFortune AI · 2d ago
  • Why AI food images look so unappetizingThe Verge AI · 4d ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleDavid Tepper's fund adds SpaceX, CoreWeave; Wall Street sees big upside