
OpenAI responded to Apple's trade-secret lawsuit by publishing a blog post claiming Apple's case rests on basic errors—including lawyers emailing the wrong person and a discussion that never took place.
OpenAI argues that ex-Apple employees in its ranks accessed Apple information only after leaving the company and only because Apple itself asked them to do so.
The clash highlights the high stakes of IP disputes in AI development and the importance of establishing clear timelines and communication records in litigation.
What happened
OpenAI published a blog post titled "Apple is getting this wrong" in response to Apple's lawsuit claiming OpenAI staff stole trade secrets. OpenAI said Apple's lawyers emailed the wrong person after confusing two Asian last names, and that Apple admitted a claimed discussion with OpenAI's General Counsel never happened. OpenAI also said the ex-Apple staff who work for the company only accessed Apple information after leaving because Apple asked them to, after Apple failed to access the files itself.
Why it matters
The dispute centers on whether OpenAI improperly obtained confidential Apple information—a core claim in Apple's litigation. OpenAI's detailed rebuttal, citing specific communication failures and Apple's own admission of error, suggests the company is mounting a vigorous defense and claims the lawsuit is built on factual mistakes rather than actual misconduct.
What to watch
The full exchange of text messages and emails that OpenAI referenced in its blog post, which the company says supports its version of events.
Apple sued OpenAI, claiming the company's staff had stolen Apple trade secrets. In response, OpenAI published a blog post with the headline "Apple is getting this wrong," arguing that the lawsuit is built on a series of factual errors. OpenAI detailed two primary mistakes: first, Apple's outside lawyers contacted the wrong person at OpenAI after confusing two employees' Asian last names—a mistake Apple has now acknowledged. Second, Apple claimed in the lawsuit that company officials had a discussion with OpenAI's General Counsel, but Apple has since conceded that this discussion never happened. OpenAI also addressed the core allegation about access to Apple information. The company said that ex-Apple employees now working at OpenAI only accessed Apple information after they had left Apple. Crucially, OpenAI stated that this access occurred because Apple itself asked them to do so—specifically after Apple had failed to access certain files on its own. OpenAI invited readers to review the full text messages and emails supporting its account, signaling confidence in the documentary record. The public airing of the dispute reflects the high-stakes nature of trade-secret claims in the AI industry, where companies guard competitive advantages closely, and also highlights how quickly procedural errors and miscommunication can snowball into major litigation.
Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI alleged that the AI company's employees misappropriated Apple trade secrets, representing a significant IP dispute at a moment when technology companies are intensely protective of proprietary AI methods and data. OpenAI's response disputes the factual foundation of the case, claiming that the lawsuit is premised on a series of procedural and substantive errors—beginning with basic communication breakdowns on Apple's side. The company's public rebuttal, detailed enough to cite text messages and emails, suggests OpenAI is confident in its legal position and believes the evidence will vindicate it. The dispute underscores the complexity of tracking information access and intent when employees move between major tech firms, and how easily miscommunication can escalate into litigation.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
OpenAI completed a stock buyback worth roughly $7 billion, allowing current and former employees to sell share…

Brad Lightcap, OpenAI's Chief Operating Officer until April 2026 and a longtime executive who built the compan…

Brad Lightcap, who served as OpenAI's COO and most recently as special projects lead, announced his departure…

CEO Sundar Pichai announced that the Gemini app has surpassed 1 billion monthly active users, making it the 14…

Brad Lightcap, who joined OpenAI in 2018 and served as chief financial officer for four years before becoming…

River AI, founded by xAI co-founder Igor Babuschkin, raised $1.1 billion in a seed/Series A round led by Gener…

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.
Sign up free