AIToday
Large Language ModelsITmedia AI+Published: Sep 29, 2026, 10:01 JST

Dentsu AI clears 99% on 20万件超 approvals

Dentsu AI clears 99% on 20万件超 approvals

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Dentsu Group embedded generative AI in its accounting approval process and says it reached 99% accuracy on the targeted work; early on, human and AI judgments matched only 15.4%. It kept a human decision in the loop.

  2. Why it matters

    Even after digitizing purchase requests, checking amounts against quotations and confirming internal rules stayed manual, so more requests meant more checking work; AI is meant to take on that load.

  3. What to watch

    The 15.4% match rate and the later 99% figure suggest the fix was not AI alone — Dentsu's review also questioned where human approval itself should change, according to CIO/CISO Shuji Nezu.

WHO IT HITSThis lands on finance and accounting operations teams — the back-office staff who reconcile purchase orders with quotations and check internal rules — as a sign that generative AI can absorb part of that approval workload, while a human sign-off is likely to remain.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Digitizing a purchase request does not by itself remove the human work behind it. Someone still has to match the order amount against the quotation, confirm it follows internal rules, and decide how to treat exceptional transactions. Once paper and seals became an approval button on screen, that checking work remained — and the more requests came in, the more of it there was to do.

Dentsu Group's answer was to put generative AI into the approval step of its accounting system. The starting point was not smooth: in the early stage of testing, human and AI verdicts agreed only 15.4% of the time. As the team changed models and adjusted prompts, it also found that the human approval side had points worth revisiting, not just the AI.

The larger question is where the line between AI and human judgment should sit. Dentsu says it reached 99% accuracy on the targeted work, yet did not leave the decision to AI alone — a sign that for this kind of checking, the value of the AI may lie as much in how it reshapes the human review around it as in the accuracy number itself.

FAQ
What accuracy did Dentsu's AI reach?
Dentsu Group says it reached 99% accuracy on the accounting approval work the AI targeted.
Why didn't Dentsu let AI handle everything?
In early testing, human and AI judgments matched only 15.4% of the time. Reviewing the gap showed that human approval, not just the AI, needed fixing, according to dentsu Japan CIO/CISO Shuji Nezu.
How many purchase-request checks are involved?
The article refers to more than 200,000 purchase confirmation items a year that remained even after the process was digitized.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Anthropic ships Claude Sonnet 5.5, 30%+ faster at same priceITmedia AI+ · 39m ago
  • Nvidia launches tool to quarantine rogue AI agentsSemafor Tech · 39m ago
  • ChatGPT ban wipes out an entire office, appeal rejected in hoursZenn AI/ML · 39m ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleChina Travel Curbs Now Cover Families of Alibaba, DeepSeek AI Staff