What happened
Santiago Schnell resigned as Dartmouth's provost after a reporter's August investigation found AI-generated text in his guest columns, part of 50 such columns spotted across The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post in one month.
Why it matters
The reporter argues Schnell's writing was based on his own ideas and research, and that forcing resignations over a tool this common may be impossible to sustain.
Summaries like this, every morning.
The resignation follows an August investigation that used an AI-assisted analysis to scan guest columns in three of the most prominent U.S. newspapers, finding 50 examples of AI-generated text in a single month. That scale is what makes the case awkward for publications that formally prohibit AI use: the reporter's stated hope was that the findings would raise questions about whether a blanket ban is realistic, not trigger a dismissal.
The specifics of Schnell's case sit at the center of that tension. According to what he told The Dartmouth newspaper, his process involved developing the ideas, conducting the research, evaluating sources, setting the structure and deciding the final text, which suggests AI played a supporting rather than generative role. The reporter's judgment is that any wrongdoing lay in failing to disclose the use to outlets that ban it.
The student reaction points to the other side of the equation: students are often barred from AI in class and punished when caught, so a senior administrator's resignation can look like consistency. The reporter's counterargument is that forced resignations do not stop a practice common enough to appear across major outlets in a single month.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
