
What happened
Security researcher James Kettle presented findings at Black Hat Las Vegas showing that agentic AI (AI systems that act autonomously) can discover novel cybersecurity vulnerabilities when guided by human expertise. Working with Anthropic's and OpenAI's latest models starting in September 2025, Kettle uncovered a new vulnerability class called Shared-Parser Confusion, which exploits how web servers process both requests and responses.
Why it matters
The research shows AI's dual nature in cybersecurity—powerful for both attack and defense, but not yet truly autonomous. Kettle found that AI alone struggles to devise entirely new attack strategies without human insight, but when paired with human direction at key moments, it becomes "an extremely powerful partner in conceptualizing and uncovering new strategies for hacking." This matters because it clarifies where AI currently adds value in security work versus where human judgment remains essential.
What to watch
Kettle emphasized that the most significant finding—Shared-Parser Confusion—emerged from AI analyzing proven vulnerabilities and forming a hypothesis that Kettle then evaluated and confirmed. He stressed that this human-AI collaboration model, rather than fully autonomous AI hacking, is likely "the discovery that has the biggest long-term impact," and represents how AI systems can contribute most powerfully to cybersecurity work for both defensive and offensive purposes.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Kettle's research addresses a critical gap in the emerging discourse around agentic AI and cybersecurity. While AI vendors and security vendors have emphasized AI's autonomous capabilities in finding and fixing bugs, Kettle deliberately investigated the boundaries—where AI fails without human input. His months-long experiment, starting in September 2025 with Anthropic and OpenAI models, revealed a more nuanced reality than the "AI apocalypse" framing often dominates.
The key insight from Kettle's work is structural: AI excels at pattern recognition and hypothesis generation across vast datasets, but struggles with true conceptual innovation in isolation. The Shared-Parser Confusion discovery exemplifies this. The AI analyzed existing, proven vulnerabilities and synthesized a new hypothesis; Kettle then supplied the human judgment needed to evaluate, confirm, and contextualize it. Neither actor alone would have reached this discovery. This suggests that for the foreseeable future, the highest-impact cybersecurity work—whether defensive or offensive—will require what Kettle calls "human/AI collaboration," not AI autonomy.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Chunghwa Telecom president Rong-shy Lin said the shift from conversational AI to autonomous AI agents is resha…

Apple and Meta said they would jointly release a new open-weight AI model designed to run on high-end Macs, ai…

A writer and entrepreneur opened his daily to-do list and found 156 items, and concluded that an AI assistant…

A Zenn contributor sorted AI use into three modes — AI as an assistant, AI running alongside people, and AI th…

A non-engineer operator says one person ships four smartphone apps on Google Play, three on the App Store, wit…

A developer released agent-guardrails, a one-script Python standard-library plugin that guards Bash, Write, Ed…
