
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →Leyva-Vázquez and Smarandache's 2025 neutrosophic framework showed 'hyper-truth' (Truth+Indeterminacy+Falsity > 1.0) in 35% of LLM evaluations when dimensions are unconstrained
New study replicates findings across models from Anthropic, Meta, DeepSeek, Alibaba, and Mistral, finding hyper-truth in 84% of unconstrained evaluations
Scalar T/I/F representations cannot distinguish between different epistemic states—paradox, ignorance, and contingency all collapse to identical outputs when models adopt an 'Absorption' position (T=0, I=1, F=0)
Tensor-based approaches are proposed to recover the epistemic distinctions that neutrosophic scalars fail to express
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion




Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack