
Snowflake's CTO Circle brought 350+ engineering leaders together to share lessons on building AI-native organizations.
Rather than focusing on coding assistants alone, the discussion centered on three critical shifts: treating developer productivity as a product problem (Snowflake achieved a 4:1 satisfied-to-dissatisfied ratio by interviewing engineers and running experiments), building observability and shared data context so AI agents can reason reliably about production environments, and committing fully to AI-native structures instead of creating isolated AI teams.
Organizations moving fastest are balancing velocity with governance and operational discipline, with success measured by simplicity and speed-to-production, not token consumption.
What happened
Snowflake hosted CTO Circle at Snowflake Summit 2026 in San Francisco, bringing together more than 350 CTOs from financial services, telecommunications, retail, and technology to discuss engineering transformation. The inaugural event focused on three themes: using AI in production, balancing velocity and risk, and designing engineering teams for AI.
Why it matters
Engineering leaders are navigating how to organize teams and invest in AI as foundation models improve, but few have a shared playbook. Snowflake's own experience—treating developers as customers and increasing internal developer Net Promoter Score by more than 30 points in 18 months—shows that productivity gains come from institutionalizing successful workflows and operational discipline, not just deploying tools. Organizations moving fastest are investing in observability, shared data context, and governance to embed AI safely into production.
What to watch
Leaders emphasized that true AI-native organizations must "burn the boats"—committing fully by restructuring how teams build products and make decisions, rather than creating siloed AI teams. Success will be measured by who builds the simplest and fastest engineering system and eliminates unnecessary steps between idea and production, not by who generates the most code or consumes the most tokens.
Snowflake hosted the inaugural CTO Circle during Snowflake Summit 2026 in San Francisco, convening more than 350 CTOs from financial services, telecommunications, retail, and technology. The event was created to provide engineering leaders a trusted forum to exchange lessons on AI-native transformation, moving beyond competitive isolation that typically keeps such conversations inside individual companies.
The discussion converged on three defining themes of AI-native engineering organizations. First, on AI in production, Vivek Raghunathan, SVP of Engineering at Snowflake, argued that treating developers as customers—rather than as a productivity or culture problem—transforms how organizations adopt AI. Snowflake interviewed developers to map friction points across the software development lifecycle, established baseline metrics, and ran experiments to measure the impact of changes. The approach increased the company's internal developer Net Promoter Score by more than 30 points in 18 months, achieving a 4:1 ratio of satisfied to dissatisfied developers. Raghunathan described three stages of AI adoption: Adoption (learning to use AI tools daily), Mastery (discovering repeatable workflows that produce better outcomes), and Optimization (making those workflows organizational knowledge). At Snowflake, early adopters experimented with prompting techniques and debugging approaches; the organization then documented successful patterns and distributed them across engineering, so every developer had access to the same tools but engineers using proven workflows consistently outperformed those at early adoption levels. Jon McNeill, author of The Algorithm, encouraged leaders to reverse the typical approach: instead of beginning with technology and searching for applications, successful organizations identify key business constraints and redesign engineering systems around solving them. Success, McNeill suggested, will be measured not by code generation or token consumption but by who builds the simplest, fastest engineering system and eliminates the most unnecessary steps between idea and production.
Second, on balancing velocity and risk, Jeremy Burton, General Manager of the Observability Business Unit at Snowflake, argued that AI has entered a new phase where early experimentation is giving way to production deployment and measurable business value. AI agents generate more telemetry and interact with more systems, changing observability from infrastructure monitoring to providing the context AI systems need to operate reliably. Burton challenged the assumption that better models simply need better data; in reality, AI is only as effective as the context it can access, which extends beyond raw telemetry to include data semantics, relationships through ontologies and knowledge graphs, and business context. Aditya Gaur, Engineering Manager at Netflix, demonstrated this principle through Netflix's work on automated root cause analysis, which succeeded not primarily through AI but through years of prior investment in connecting fragmented telemetry, modeling operational relationships through an ontology and knowledge graph, and creating a shared context layer. Caitlin Colgrove, CTO at Hex, urged leaders to commit fully to AI-native structures, what she called "burning the boats"—restructuring how teams build products and make decisions rather than creating isolated AI teams. Hex initially created a dedicated AI product team, which became a bottleneck; disbanding it and distributing AI responsibility across every product team allowed the company to deliver products rapidly with embedded AI. Chris Kozlowski, Managing Director at Barclays, emphasized that speed creates value only when matched with governance and trust, particularly in regulated environments. Corey Burke, SVP Engineering at Dialpad, and Arun Rajamanickam, VP of Engineering at project44, described how AI shortens the path from identifying a customer problem to validating a solution, but only if teams have infrastructure, shared context, and operational discipline to iterate confidently.
Third, on designing engineering teams for AI, Qi Jin, EVP at Cerebras Systems, suggested that organizations optimized for previous software development generations often become the biggest barrier to AI adoption, as established processes and boundaries were designed to scale proven ways of working rather than to continuously adapt. The underlying theme across all three areas was that sustainable competitive advantage comes from institutionalizing how AI is used—through workflows, data architecture, and team structures—rather than from deploying new tools alone.
The CTO Circle event reflects a maturation in how enterprises approach AI adoption. Early conversations focused narrowly on coding assistants and developer velocity gains, but the discussion among 350+ CTOs revealed a deeper shift: organizations treating AI as a fundamental redesign of how engineering operates, not merely a tool to accelerate existing processes. Snowflake's own transformation—moving from tool deployment to institutionalizing proven workflows and measuring developer satisfaction as a product outcome—provides a concrete model that other organizations are studying.
A critical insight emerged around the relationship between velocity and reliability. As AI agents begin implementing features independently and engineers shift from writing code to defining intent and validating outcomes, the organizations moving fastest are those investing heavily in data architecture, observability, and governance. Netflix's automated root cause analysis project, for example, succeeded not because of the AI itself but because the company had spent years building a unified data layer and operational knowledge graph beforehand. Similarly, Hex's decision to disband its centralized AI team and distribute AI ownership across product teams reflects a recognition that sustained speed requires structural commitment, not isolated innovation.
The conversation also surfaced a tension between innovation and control, particularly relevant for regulated industries. Barclays and other enterprise participants underscored that speed creates value only when matched with governance and trust. This suggests that the competitive advantage in AI-native organizations will belong not to those shipping features fastest in isolation, but to those building the platforms, shared context, and operational discipline that allow teams to iterate confidently at scale.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Amazon and Google are intensifying competitive efforts against The Trade Desk (TTD), a major digital advertisi…

QumulusAI announced a GPU-as-a-Service agreement with DRW, a global trading firm, to supply a dedicated NVIDIA…

OpenAI introduced Premium Seats for ChatGPT Business, priced at $125 per user per month ($100 with annual bill…

Computer scientists at University of Tübingen, Max Planck Institute, MATS Research, and Snyk discovered a meth…

Anthropic pledged to embed machine-readable watermarks in Claude-generated text and digitally signed provenanc…

OpenAI announced that its unreleased model Astra had produced solutions to 10 long-standing mathematics proble…

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.
Sign up free