AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryThe Verge AIPublished: Sep 12, 2026, 22:00 JST2 min read

OpenAI claims Navier-Stokes solution in 88 hours

OpenAI claims Navier-Stokes solution in 88 hours

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    OpenAI says it used roughly 10,000 agents and tens of millions of dollars of compute over 88 hours to solve the Navier-Stokes problem. Mathematicians including Tristan Buckmaster and Andreas Thom have accused the company of racing rivals and exploiting their work.

  2. Why it matters

    OpenAI had previously said it could not rule out that data from Buckmaster's Codex use improved its models, before later saying this was categorically impossible. The company also withdrew its sponsorship of a Caltech math hackathon after opposition, while the Leiden Declaration has drawn nearly 3,900 signatures.

  3. What to watch

    Whether the Clay Mathematics Institute declares Navier-Stokes solved hinges on a required two-year acceptance period — the Institute has removed it from its unsolved list but not yet called it solved. OpenAI says it has made substantial progress on another Millennium Prize problem.

WHO IT HITSAcademic mathematicians and PhD students in research fields now weigh the risk that well-resourced AI companies could scoop their unfinished work before they publish. University research groups may become more secretive about ongoing problems as a result.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

OpenAI's push into mathematics has been building for years, with the company planting flags across increasingly difficult terrain. This week it claimed its biggest prize yet — a solution to Navier-Stokes, one of the seven Millennium Prize problems set out by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000, each carrying a $1 million bounty. The company says it took roughly 10,000 agents, tens of millions of dollars of compute, and just 88 hours. It also discovered it was racing NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge, a researcher at rival Anthropic.

The sequence of events that followed is fiercely contested. Buckmaster says he was offered nearly unlimited compute and sole authorship of OpenAI's paper if he excluded Alpöge, which he called a bribe and rejected. OpenAI's Laurance Fauconnet said it is categorically impossible for Buckmaster's Codex prompts to have influenced the system, while the company earlier acknowledged it could not rule out that derived data was used. Separately, Andreas Thom found OpenAI had quietly amended an announcement to credit his work without public disclosure. For mathematicians, the deeper problem is the asymmetry: AI companies can spin up thousands of agents whenever word spreads that a breakthrough is near, turning scooping into an industrial process. The Leiden Declaration, endorsed by the International Mathematical Union and signed by nearly 3,900 people, urges policymakers not to buy into corporate hype.

For all the rush, OpenAI won't know whether it has won for years, since the Clay Mathematics Institute requires a two-year acceptance period. Meanwhile, OpenAI says it has made substantial progress on another Millennium Prize problem, and rumors suggest Anthropic may be closing in on one too. Whether the field can rebuild trust may hinge on whether mathematicians accept voluntary norms like the Leiden Declaration, or whether the fear Buckmaster describes — colleagues declining to attach their names publicly — hardens into a lasting chill on open research.

FAQ
How long did it take OpenAI to solve Navier-Stokes?
OpenAI says it took roughly 88 hours using about 10,000 agents and tens of millions of dollars of compute.
Why are mathematicians upset with OpenAI?
Tristan Buckmaster says he was offered nearly unlimited compute and sole authorship of OpenAI's paper if he excluded his collaborator Levent Alpöge, which Buckmaster rejected as a bribe. Andreas Thom says OpenAI quietly amended an announcement to acknowledge his contribution without publicly disclosing the change.
When will the Navier-Stokes solution officially count as solved?
The Clay Mathematics Institute requires a two-year period after publication during which the result must gain general acceptance in the global mathematics community — the process is described as deliberately unhurried.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Meta's Muse AI agent prices in at $20 and $100 a monthYahoo Finance AI · 2h ago
  • OpenAI agents hit RubyGems with 2,000+ malicious packagesTHE DECODER · 2h ago
  • AI hangover hits firms; cure isn't more GenAI useFortune AI · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleAlphabet's AI spend sinks cash flow, but Cloud jumps 82%