AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryTHE DECODERPublished: Oct 8, 2026, 04:00 JST

Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 cuts prices 75%, scores 1,620

Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 cuts prices 75%, scores 1,620

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, a small model priced about 75 percent below Haiku 4.5 and scoring 1,620 on GDPval-AA v2.1 versus 735 for its predecessor.

  2. Why it matters

    Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 brings a major performance jump at about 75 percent less cost, which the company frames as making high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks cheaper to run.

  3. What to watch

    Real-world savings may be smaller because Anthropic says Haiku 5.5's updated tokenizer consumes slightly more tokens per task; the model is available now across all platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.

WHO IT HITSTeams running high-volume, cost-sensitive AI workloads — summarization, database queries, classification, and live customer support — gain a cheaper option that Anthropic says costs about 75 percent less than Haiku 4.5. For developers weighing computer-use and agentic coding tasks, the tokenizer caveat may narrow the effective savings.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 as its fastest and most affordable small model to date, aimed at high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, database queries, classification, and live customer support. The company says the average cost is about 75 percent below Haiku 4.5, and for prompts up to 100,000 tokens — which Anthropic says cover roughly 90 percent of all previous Haiku requests — prices drop by up to 90 percent.

The benchmark picture is where the release gets its edge. Haiku 5.5 scores 1,620 on GDPval-AA v2.1, more than double Haiku 4.5's 735, and it jumps from zero to 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Computer use shows the largest gain, reaching 72.4% on OSWorld-2.1 versus 15.7% — a fit, the company notes, because computer use burns through large amounts of tokens. Haiku 5.5 is also the first Haiku-class model with adjustable reasoning levels, letting users trade cost against quality, though Anthropic still points complex agentic coding toward its larger models.

One caveat cuts against the headline numbers: Anthropic says the updated tokenizer consumes slightly more tokens per task, as happened with the Opus 4.x models where token usage jumped about 30 percent from the tokenizer change alone. Real-world savings therefore are likely to be smaller than per-token prices suggest. How much of the promised cost cut survives that effect — for teams running summarization or support agents at scale — is the practical test.

FAQ
How much cheaper is Claude Haiku 5.5 than Haiku 4.5?
Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 costs about 75 percent less on average. For prompts up to 100,000 tokens, which Anthropic says account for roughly 90 percent of all previous Haiku requests, prices drop by up to 90 percent.
Where can I use Claude Haiku 5.5?
Anthropic says Haiku 5.5 is available now across all platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Does Haiku 5.5 beat OpenAI's budget model?
Anthropic lists OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna as a comparison, and Haiku 5.5 leads across every tested category. Sonnet 5.5 reference scores show Haiku 5.5 still falls well behind Anthropic's larger model.

Also reported by AI Watch (Impress), GIGAZINE AI, Impress Watch, SiliconANGLE AI, Simon Willison's Weblog

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleHiPHI dataset targets humanoid robot training gap