
What happened
Developer nanaism released 'yomiyasu', a rewriting skill for AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, installable with 'npx skills add nanaism/yomiyasu'. It restores sentence structure and turns metaphorical verbs into literal descriptions rather than banning specific words.
Why it matters
Rewriting who did what, and what actually happened, should make generated documents easier to follow.
What to watch
Whether the rules hold up outside the author's own 160-document corpus, which pairs LLM outputs with human-written documents. The one-command install and MIT license make that easy to test in a real team.
WHO IT HITSEngineers and technical writers who draft Japanese PR descriptions, specs and Slack announcements with AI agents stand to gain the most, since the skill targets the sentences those workflows produce. Teams that maintain their own documentation style guides could fork the rules, as it is published under the MIT license.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The skill grew out of a specific frustration with existing anti-AI-slop tools. Their instructions often used the very metaphorical verbs they told writers to avoid, and LLMs imitate the style of the prompt itself. They also told models to shorten the most important sentence to evade a sentence-length detector, which produced abrupt punchlines like 'Order is everything.' In response, the author built a corpus of 160 documents across eight practical genres and wrote a linter with lookaround regular expressions that ignore legitimate phrases such as 'grab the initiative' or 'melt ice'.
The design rests on three choices. First, instead of telling a model to replace words, the skill walks it through identifying the actor, reducing the event to physical facts, restoring subject-object-verb order, and flattening decorative formatting. Second, it forbids inserting short sentences just to vary rhythm and turns noun-heavy phrases back into verbs. Third, the skill's own instruction file was checked by the linter until it scored zero deductions, so the prompt itself serves as a model of the target style. A bundled Python script scores documents out of 100, deducting points for metaphorical verbs, decorative symbols, excessive bold and noun pile-ups.
Whether this approach travels beyond the author's own corpus is the open question. The boundary and human-written tests showed no false positives after the lookaround rewrite, but those 64 documents were assembled by the author. The test for teams is whether the rules survive contact with their own idioms, and the MIT license makes that easy to check. If it holds, the payoff is smaller: readers spend less time reconstructing who did what from context.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Carvana and CarMax are jockeying as agentic AI tools look to fix the worst parts of car buying, with AI shoppi…

Google DeepMind launched Gemini 4 Argon for coding, enterprise knowledge work and cyber defense, claiming firs…

Panasonic Connect added the 13.3-inch NC7 to its Let's Note lineup for individual buyers, selling it only on i…

Bloomberg reports Amazon's delivery smart glasses shoot still images at intervals during walks, possibly thous…

After forcing Hermes Agent's backend to Vulkan with the command "hermes config set local_runtime.backend vulka…

The Information reports Google's "AI Contribution Pilot Program" pays about 100 digital publishers, including…
