AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyTechCrunch AIPublished: Jul 26, 2026, 01:01 JST2 min read

Librarians teach 'Avoiding AI' workshops as people seek refuge from forced tech

Librarians teach 'Avoiding AI' workshops as people seek refuge from forced tech

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Librarians in Philadelphia and Maine are hosting workshops that teach people how to disable AI features on their devices and platforms. Charlie Bailey, a librarian in South Philadelphia, walks attendees through step-by-step instructions for turning off Apple Intelligence, Gemini, and similar tools. Hannah Cyrus, a librarian in Maine whose journal article on the topic sparked the movement, saw about 70 people attend each of her first two workshops (including livestream attendees), forcing her to cut off in-person registration at 30 and open a waitlist.

  2. Why it matters

    The workshops have struck a chord with people frustrated by AI tools being built into devices and services without their consent. Bailey frames the effort as advancing digital literacy and helping people reclaim autonomy. The Philadelphia library's Instagram post about the workshop received over 2,000 likes and 220 shares, far exceeding typical engagement. Attendees cite concerns ranging from environmental impact to loss of control over their own devices and work lives.

  3. What to watch

    The movement reflects broader skepticism about how technology companies are integrating AI into everyday products. Bailey and Cyrus are among dozens of librarians worldwide now hosting or planning similar workshops, suggesting demand may continue to grow.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The viral success of these 'Avoiding AI' workshops reveals a significant gap between how technology companies are deploying AI and what consumers actually want. Rather than organic adoption driven by user demand, many people experience AI features as imposed—automatically present on their devices and integrated into services they already use. Charlie Bailey's observation that the library's Instagram post for the workshop received over 2,000 likes and 220 shares, compared to typical engagement of only a few dozen, demonstrates that this frustration extends far beyond a niche audience.

Librarians are positioned uniquely to address this need. As information professionals, they frame the workshops not as blanket rejection of AI but as an exercise in digital literacy and personal agency—helping people understand the technology and then choose whether to use it. This framing resonates because attendees themselves are not uniformly anti-AI; they distinguish between uses they find valuable (such as optical character recognition for archival work or medical applications) and the forced integration of AI into consumer devices. The camaraderie observed during the workshops and the willingness of attendees to share workarounds (like the Google Search parameter that hides AI results) suggests the movement is driven by a desire for control, not technology rejection.

FAQ
How many people have attended these workshops?
Hannah Cyrus's first two workshops each drew about 70 people when including livestream attendance, after she had to cut off in-person registration at 30 due to overwhelming interest. Charlie Bailey's first workshop in Philadelphia drew so many registrations that he scheduled a second program.
What specifically do these workshops teach?
Librarians provide step-by-step instructions on how to disable AI features like Apple Intelligence and Gemini across popular tech platforms and devices. They begin with an overview of how AI chatbots work and why people might want to opt out, then walk through practical disabling steps on a projector.
Who started this workshop trend?
Hannah Cyrus, a librarian in Maine, developed the first workshop after receiving repeated patron questions about how to turn off AI features. She published a journal article about her approach, which prompted dozens of librarians from around the world to contact her for guidance and resources.

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Anthropic's Dario Amodei: time to pump the brakes on AIThe Verge AI · 2h ago
  • KAIST study: AI reasoning steps separable inside modelsTHE DECODER · 5h ago
  • Amodei urges AI speed limits, warns on recursive self-improvementTHE DECODER · 5h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleAI Hedge Fund Manager Aschenbrenner Bets 20% of SharonAI, Stock Doubles YTD