
What happened
Librarians in Philadelphia and Maine are hosting workshops that teach people how to disable AI features on their devices and platforms. Charlie Bailey, a librarian in South Philadelphia, walks attendees through step-by-step instructions for turning off Apple Intelligence, Gemini, and similar tools. Hannah Cyrus, a librarian in Maine whose journal article on the topic sparked the movement, saw about 70 people attend each of her first two workshops (including livestream attendees), forcing her to cut off in-person registration at 30 and open a waitlist.
Why it matters
The workshops have struck a chord with people frustrated by AI tools being built into devices and services without their consent. Bailey frames the effort as advancing digital literacy and helping people reclaim autonomy. The Philadelphia library's Instagram post about the workshop received over 2,000 likes and 220 shares, far exceeding typical engagement. Attendees cite concerns ranging from environmental impact to loss of control over their own devices and work lives.
What to watch
The movement reflects broader skepticism about how technology companies are integrating AI into everyday products. Bailey and Cyrus are among dozens of librarians worldwide now hosting or planning similar workshops, suggesting demand may continue to grow.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The viral success of these 'Avoiding AI' workshops reveals a significant gap between how technology companies are deploying AI and what consumers actually want. Rather than organic adoption driven by user demand, many people experience AI features as imposed—automatically present on their devices and integrated into services they already use. Charlie Bailey's observation that the library's Instagram post for the workshop received over 2,000 likes and 220 shares, compared to typical engagement of only a few dozen, demonstrates that this frustration extends far beyond a niche audience.
Librarians are positioned uniquely to address this need. As information professionals, they frame the workshops not as blanket rejection of AI but as an exercise in digital literacy and personal agency—helping people understand the technology and then choose whether to use it. This framing resonates because attendees themselves are not uniformly anti-AI; they distinguish between uses they find valuable (such as optical character recognition for archival work or medical applications) and the forced integration of AI into consumer devices. The camaraderie observed during the workshops and the willingness of attendees to share workarounds (like the Google Search parameter that hides AI results) suggests the movement is driven by a desire for control, not technology rejection.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-step plan to 'pace the frontier' — slowing training and developmen…

A KAIST and Naver AI Lab study found that reasoning operations like extraction, decomposition, formula recall…

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for a slowdown in AI development, specifically methods letting AI improve it…

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay proposing a three-step plan to slow frontier AI progress, and sa…

In a Fortune commentary, Mark Penn argues the web's cookie banners, CAPTCHAs, passcodes and endless terms wast…

The Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA officials, released a report identifying 30 federa…
