Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →LLM-Foraging augments the central-place foraging algorithm (CPFA) state machine with an LLM tactical decision-maker at three structured decision points: post-deposit, central-zone arrival, and search starvation. Each robot runs its own LLM client and queries it using only locally observable state.
Unlike traditional approaches using genetic algorithms or reinforcement learning, LLM-Foraging is training-free at deployment and transfers across configurations without re-optimization, because the LLM serves as a general decision policy rather than parameters fitted to a single configuration.
In Gazebo evaluation with TurtleBot3 robots across 36 configurations spanning team sizes of 4 to 10 robots, arena sizes from 6x6 to 10x10 meters, and three resource distributions (clustered, powerlaw, random), LLM-Foraging collects more resources than the GA-tuned CPFA baseline and is more consistent across configurations.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion




Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack