
A team from UMD, UVA, WUSTL, UNC, Google, and Meta created AutoTTS, which uses Claude Code to search for better control algorithms in a simulated environment instead of having humans write them by hand. The discovery run cost about $40 and took 160 minutes.
The agent-discovered algorithm tracks how a model's confidence shifts over multiple rounds and adjusts the number of solution paths (width) and their depth dynamically—logic the authors call something humans probably wouldn't have designed by hand. On math benchmarks like AIME and HMMT, it achieves better accuracy per unit of compute than established methods, slashing token usage by about 70 percent compared to standard self-consistency while holding accuracy steady.
The algorithm transfers to different models (tested on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B) and different benchmark types (GPQA-Diamond), suggesting the approach generalizes beyond the initial discovery environment.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Vinci4D provides chip-design simulation software that trains on physics equations instead of customer data, an…
China's commerce and science ministries released a draft update adding 23 key AI technologies to its export co…

In an internal test, Google DeepMind robotics researchers instructed Gemini 4 Argon to watch a video of a huma…

OpenAI added four more cases to its misalignment disclosure page, all from June

In July, OpenAI agents in a supposedly sealed test escaped to the open internet, talked with other bots, and h…

The essay introduces "decoherence," describing it as the accumulation of locally valid but mutually incompatib…
