AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Business & IndustryTHE DECODERPublished: Sep 16, 2026, 04:00 JST

Nvidia wary of Anthropic's Fable for sensitive work

Nvidia wary of Anthropic's Fable for sensitive work

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Nvidia, an Anthropic investor and hardware supplier, uses Anthropic's Fable only for less sensitive tasks like open-source projects, according to The Information.

  2. Why it matters

    Nvidia runs internal work such as AI-powered supply chain monitoring on its own Nemotron models instead—showing even an Anthropic backer withholds proprietary work from Fable.

  3. What to watch

    Palantir is blocking Fable deployment through its software until Anthropic grants irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees, so Anthropic's response to those demands is the test.

WHO IT HITSEnterprise AI and security teams at large firms handling proprietary code or intellectual property are reconsidering whether they can route sensitive work through third-party AI models at all, given the zero-data-retention gaps the article describes.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The friction runs through Anthropic's own backers and customers. Nvidia has invested in Anthropic, reportedly plans to continue doing so, and supplies the company with hardware for model development, yet it uses Fable only for less sensitive tasks. Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the earliest users of Anthropic's Mythos model, has banned employees from using Fable for work on proprietary cybersecurity software, with CTO Bill Vass saying the company worries Fable might be learning from some of its code.

Anthropic has tried to respond. After customer pushback and OpenAI's August move to let GPT-5.6 Cyber customers store security logs on their own servers, Anthropic followed suit with a similar program rolling out to select customers this fall. But zero data retention still leaves gaps, because both OpenAI and Anthropic collect metadata and technical usage data from enterprise customers, according to The Information.

OpenAI co-founder John Schulman and AI researcher Sarah Hooker point to deeper limits. Schulman laid out a spectrum of training approaches that can still extract customer IP, called de-identification weak, and said users can be traced back with just a small number of bits. Buckmaster's Navier-Stokes dispute with OpenAI, even after OpenAI's internal investigation cleared the Codex prompts of influencing the system, showed how fragile the trust between business, academia, and the AI labs really is.

FAQ
What does zero data retention actually protect against?
Even with zero data retention, OpenAI and Anthropic still collect metadata and technical usage data from enterprise customers, according to The Information. Some customers aren't sure what that metadata covers and don't think the current transparency is enough.
Why did Anthropic change its data policy?
It came after customer pushback and OpenAI's August move to let GPT-5.6 Cyber customers store security logs on their own servers. Anthropic followed suit with a similar program rolling out to select customers this fall.
What did Tristan Buckmaster accuse OpenAI of?
Buckmaster and co-author Levent Alpöge uploaded drafts of their Navier-Stokes work through OpenAI's Codex, and OpenAI later presented its own breakthrough using the same unusual solution path. OpenAI initially said it could not rule out that anonymized data from their use contributed to improving its models.

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • AIUC raises $40 million to audit frontier AI modelsSiliconANGLE AI · 1h ago
  • Amodei, Altman slowdown calls hit AI stocks, but fears called overblownYahoo Finance AI · 1h ago
  • Musk pitches mutual AI model checks ahead of Trump-Xi talksSemafor Tech · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleCADDi raises $114 million, hits $1.2 billion valuation