AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Business & IndustryTechCrunch AIPublished: Aug 5, 2026, 01:01 JST

Apple seeks injunction against OpenAI, names 11 more ex-employees in trade secrets case

Apple seeks injunction against OpenAI, names 11 more ex-employees in trade secrets case

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Apple filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from developing AI devices or products based on Apple's technology, and revealed that 11 additional former Apple employees beyond the two originally named (Chang Liu and Tang Yew Tan) may have been involved in or witnessed the alleged trade secrets theft. The filing also cites specific instances: one former employee met with Liu and OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng before her interview at OpenAI and discussed confidential information about unannounced products; another took screenshots of confidential Apple documents before interviewing at OpenAI; and multiple former employees now at OpenAI have contacted Apple about returning Apple-issued work devices they kept when they left.

  2. Why it matters

    The escalation signals Apple believes the misconduct extends well beyond the original complaint and involves a broader pattern of confidential information transfer. Apple is requesting expedited discovery to investigate the full scope of the alleged scheme. OpenAI has publicly denied the claims, stating it does not have or want any of Apple's trade secrets and pointing to errors in Apple's handling of the case (including emailing the wrong person at OpenAI).

  3. What to watch

    Apple's motion for a preliminary injunction is pending before the court. The outcome will determine whether OpenAI faces legal restrictions on product development while the case proceeds, and whether the court grants Apple's request for expedited discovery to identify the full extent of alleged employee involvement.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Apple's latest filing marks a significant escalation in its intellectual property dispute with OpenAI. The original complaint focused on two named employees—Chang Liu and Tang Yew Tan—but the new motion reveals that investigation has uncovered a broader pattern of potential misconduct involving 11 additional former Apple employees. This expansion suggests Apple believes the trade secrets transfer was not isolated to a handful of individuals but part of a more systemic issue involving multiple departing staff members.

The specific allegations paint a detailed picture of alleged coordination: an employee discussed confidential unannounced product information in advance of a job interview, another captured internal documents, and multiple former employees have now contacted Apple to return company devices. These details indicate Apple views the misconduct as deliberate and coordinated rather than accidental or incidental. By requesting expedited discovery, Apple is pushing the court to move quickly and comprehensively to identify all parties involved.

OpenAI's public response denies the core allegation—that it possesses or wants Apple's trade secrets—and highlights procedural missteps in Apple's investigation (a misdirected email, confusion about communications with its general counsel). The company frames itself as focused on innovation rather than appropriating competitors' intellectual property. The dispute now hinges on whether the court believes Apple's expanded evidence warrants expedited proceedings and a preliminary injunction, or whether OpenAI's procedural critiques and categorical denials are sufficient to proceed under normal discovery timelines.

FAQ
Who are the employees accused of taking Apple's trade secrets?
The original complaint named Chang Liu (senior systems engineer) and Tang Yew Tan (Chief Hardware Officer) at OpenAI, and OpenAI employee Yu-Ting Peng. Apple's latest filing reveals 11 additional former Apple employees may have been involved as witnesses or otherwise participated in the alleged misconduct.
What specific evidence of misconduct does Apple cite?
Apple's filing states that one former Apple employee met with Liu and Peng before Peng's interview at OpenAI to discuss confidential information about unannounced products; another former employee took screenshots of confidential Apple documents before interviewing at OpenAI; and multiple former Apple employees now working at OpenAI have reached out to return Apple-issued work devices they kept when departing.
What is Apple asking the court to do?
Apple is seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent OpenAI from developing AI devices or other products based on Apple's technology, and requesting expedited discovery to investigate the full extent of the alleged trade secrets theft.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleGoogle launches three Gemini models for AI agents, Gemini Robotics ER 2