ProPlaintiff, EvenUp, Supio lead AI medical chronology tools for injury firms

The comparison spread across ProPlaintiff, EvenUp, Supio, Anytime AI, Tavrn and CaseMark reflects a shift in where the work actually sits. Personal-injury files arrive as records from hospitals, imaging centers, specialists and therapists, and the delay has two parts: assembling those records and then converting them into a usable treatment history. Most of the tools here begin with files the firm already holds, but Tavrn also requests records from providers and tracks outstanding requests, which addresses the stage before generation.

The tools also split over review responsibility, which has staffing implications. EvenUp gives firms a choice between AI + You, where the firm's own team reviews and finalizes, and AI + Professional Review with an optional nurse review. ProPlaintiff leans toward editable documents matched to an existing firm template, while Supio and Anytime AI emphasize searching, filtering and following patterns of care over a fixed output. CaseMark offers several formats, including a comprehensive chronology and an injury-focused medical analysis.

What none of them replace is the legal team's check on material entries. A flagged interval, an unfulfilled referral and a gap between appointments are different problems, and the chronology is expected to preserve those distinctions while keeping source pages close to each entry.