
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →Springer Nature retracted a meta-analysis published in Humanities & Social Sciences Communications on May 6, 2025, that claimed ChatGPT has a large positive impact on student learning performance, moderately positive impact on learning perception, and fosters higher-order thinking. The publisher cited discrepancies in the analysis and lack of confidence in the conclusions.
The retracted paper analyzed results from 51 previous research studies to quantify the effect of ChatGPT on students' learning across experimental groups using ChatGPT and control groups that did not. Experts questioned whether sufficient high-quality studies on ChatGPT and learning could have been conducted in the roughly two and a half years since OpenAI released ChatGPT in November 2022.
Despite retraction, the paper accumulated 262 citations in Springer Nature peer-reviewed journals and 504 total citations from peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources. It also attracted nearly half a million readers and ranked in the 99th percentile for journal articles in attention score.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion




Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack