
What happened
Paul Cheek's AI-Driven Enterprise Institute study found just over 30% of S&P 500 executives are AI-literate, and those executives achieve 78% stronger AI execution than peers.
Why it matters
Cheek says CHROs should own this gap — investing in AI training and making AI literacy part of workforce planning — positioning HR as the strategic leader for human-agent organization.
What to watch
Cheek has not found any company that has implemented his AI-native org chart, so the pitch hinges on whether CHROs adopt training before redesign; he built a prototype himself.
WHO IT HITSChief human resources officers (CHROs) at large companies are the audience Cheek is pitching, and they are being asked to shift from managing headcount to auditing whether a role needs human judgment or an AI agent's uptime. Their decisions on AI training and org-chart redesign could reshape how work is assigned across the enterprise.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The org chart most companies use today maps reporting lines — who answers to whom. Cheek's proposal replaces that with a map of access and authority: which employees and AI agents can reach which systems, who can spend from which budgets, and who gets consulted on which projects. He describes it as a dynamic, living document that changes as AI agents are added, retired, or build their own agents, tracking everything from social media accounts to Salesforce.
The study from Cheek's independent research organization, the AI-Driven Enterprise Institute, gives the pitch its numbers: just over 30% of executives at S&P 500 companies are AI-literate, and that group is achieving 78% stronger AI execution than their peers. Cheek's first step for CHROs is investing in AI training and upskilling; the second is rethinking the org chart. He argues the CHRO who takes this on will emerge as the most influential strategic leader in the organization.
What remains unproven is the org chart itself. Cheek acknowledges he has not found a company that has implemented this kind of technologically-advanced org chart — he built his own prototype using AI instead. So the near-term test is likely whether CHROs act on the literacy gap before adopting a new structural model, and whether training alone moves execution numbers. That makes the next phase one to watch for HR leaders weighing where to put budget and authority.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Autoheal AI Inc. raised $7.9 million in seed funding led by Innovation Endeavors, with Emergent Ventures, U&I…
From 7/30 to 9/17, /code-review ran 23 times with at most 1 subagent; from 9/23 it launched 10 at once, hittin…

Mizushima (technology evangelist at Nextbeat) gave Claude Fable 5.1 a five-step goal chain; it first shipped a…

A Zenn article narrowed agent cost design to three topics: cache depends on prefix stability, routing should b…

Working alone with 10 parallel Claude Code sessions, he logged 2,848 commits, 1,212 pull requests and 1,138 me…

Two Claude Code scheduled tasks on 9:10 and 10:01 morning runs produced no start rows, no errors and no notifi…
