AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentOpen-Source AIWIRED AIPublished: Nov 7, 2026, 04:00 JST

Open-weight DeepSeek nears Daybreak on hacking tasks, Vals finds

Send on LINE
Open-weight DeepSeek nears Daybreak on hacking tasks, Vals finds

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Vals tested AI models on simulated corporate networks; OpenAI's restricted Daybreak completed 81% of tasks, while open-weight DeepSeek averaged 73%, and on some tasks the two scored equally.

  2. Why it matters

    Closed models no longer hold a definitive edge in cyber skills, so gated access may only buy time before advanced hacking capabilities are broadly available, according to Vals.

WHO IT HITSSecurity teams at companies running their own AI models may find open-weight tools nearly as capable as restricted frontier systems for probing networks, potentially lowering the cost of both defense and attack.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The Vals experiment lands as frontier labs, particularly Anthropic, have argued that gated access to advanced models can buy time before hacking capabilities become widely available. Anthropic's Logan Graham told WIRED in April that the company's Project Glasswing aimed to get tools to defenders for a head start, and that the world needed to prepare for broad availability in 6, 12, or 24 months. Seven months later, Vals's findings suggest that transition has arrived on schedule, with open-weight models like DeepSeek matching restricted ones on many simulated tasks.

Yet real-world observation of cybercriminal and state-backed activity has repeatedly shown attackers conserving resources and making do with older, less capable models for most of their activity. Even with strict controls, defenders must assume the best-funded attackers have already had some access to closed models. Alex Zenla of Edera cautions that closed labs likely have additional unreleased models exceeding these capabilities, framing the situation as a cat-and-mouse game in which labs race to secure vulnerabilities before open-weight models find them.

FAQ
How much cheaper is DeepSeek than GPT-6-Sol for carrying out an attack?
Vals says it costs $17 to $46 in tokens for GPT-6-Sol to carry out an attack, compared to $2 to $3 for DeepSeek.
What is Daybreak and who can use it?
Daybreak is OpenAI's most advanced cyber model, available only to trusted partners.
Did DeepSeek match Daybreak on all tasks?
No, DeepSeek completed 73% of objectives on average versus 81% for Daybreak, but on some tasks the two models scored equally.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMeta adds Spaces to Muse agents for project tracking