
Claims adjusters are the most anti-AI workers in America. Glassdoor found 98% of their AI mentions are critical.
They feel overwhelmed by error-prone AI and fear job loss.
The profession is shrinking, and adjusters want AI kept as a tool, not a replacement.
What happened
A Glassdoor analysis found that claims adjusters who mention AI are critical of it 98% of the time, the highest rate among U.S. workers. Their complaints focus on error-prone AI forced on them by leaders, which creates more work and cleanup.
Why it matters
The profession is shrinking: the Bureau of Labor Statistics expects claims adjuster numbers to fall by 18,900 (5%) over the coming decade, and employment dropped 21% between May 2025 and May 2026. Entry-level postings have fallen 50% since 2025, and adjusters worry they are training their replacements.
What to watch
AI is already handling significant workloads, like Lemonade's chatbot AI Jim handling initial reports 96% of the time and automation processing 55% of all claims. Whether insurers balance this with human empathy will shape the industry's future.
Ask the AI about this article →
The Glassdoor research highlights a tension between AI adoption and workforce morale. Insurers like Lemonade are pushing automation to handle routine claims, freeing humans for complex cases, but adjusters on the ground report that AI often creates more work when it fails. A former adjuster, Ahmad Jackson, described AI-driven hallucinations leading to angry claimants and he quit his job. Glassdoor economist Chris Martin says this is a 'reckoning' for the profession.
The data shows a steep decline in adjuster employment, with BLS projecting a 5% drop over the decade and a 21% fall in one year. This pressure likely fuels the anti-AI sentiment, as workers sense job insecurity. However, adjusters do see value in AI for administrative tasks, just not as a replacement for human judgment. Conrad, an Alabama claims executive, insists AI should never be 'given the keys'—it must remain a tool under human control.
The stakes are high: if AI errors lead to wrong payouts, customers blame the adjuster, not the algorithm. Insurers face a challenge in integrating AI without alienating their workforce or compromising service quality.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Chinese large-model developer Z.ai says it can now support large-scale inference using roughly 100,000 domesti…

AI system scaling has pushed interconnect requirements inside data centers from chips and boards up to racks…

Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo says Nvidia has revived the Rubin CPX AI accelerator with a substantially redesigned arch…

Palantir Technologies stock has posted multi-year gains, including an 11x return over 3 years

Apple has escalated its legal battle against OpenAI, claiming in a new court filing that OpenAI is actively de…

Samsung Electronics has locked up as much as 70% of its memory production capacity under long-term supply agre…
