AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Coding AssistantsAI Business & IndustryZenn AI/MLPublished: Oct 20, 2026, 13:00 JST

Claude Code ran a solo business for 30 days: 14 tasks, 2 deals

Send on LINE
Claude Code ran a solo business for 30 days: 14 tasks, 2 deals

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    From Sept 10 to Oct 10, the operator delegated sales, publishing, video posting and bookkeeping to 14 scheduled Claude Code tasks; results were 255 pitches, 3 replies, 2 contracts worth 8,500 yen total, and zero product sales.

  2. Why it matters

    The write-up argues the durable value was not revenue but AI running unattended without breaking and keeping humans on the send/publish buttons, with 45 recorded incidents shaping the rules.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The record is unusual less for the tools than for the accounting. The operator deliberately measured something other than sales: how long the AI could run while the human slept, and how often the human-only buttons stayed human-only. On those two measures, the setup held by day 30, even as revenue stayed at zero and a week-five audit forced a rebuild of the selling side.

The incident log explains why so many rules exist. A duplicate video upload nearly happened because completion was judged from the text of the board rather than a dated completion record. Two Claude Code agents sharing one git worktree led the reviewer to run git restore and wipe uncommitted work. Fake test spreadsheets passed while dropping leading zeros in phone numbers and seconds in timestamps. Each failure turned into a rule such as distinguishing empty from zero, forbidding git add -A, and stopping without input when a screen does not match assumptions.

The pitch data also redirected the strategy. On day 22, reviewing 151 pitches showed the median application count at send time was 94 and prices clustered near budget ceilings. The two wins came from listings that were fresh, had around 10 applicants, and had budgets under 10,000 yen. That group returned 8.8% replies, while the crowded, large-budget group that made up 64% of sends returned 0 of 81.

FAQ
How much money did the 30-day experiment make?
Two contracts totaling 8,500 yen, plus zero product sales. The operator says the experiment was not about revenue.
What did humans still have to do?
People pressed every send, publish, apply, purchase and login button. The AI only produced drafts, and a human read one Markdown board each morning and logged numbers each night.
Why were browser-based video posts stopped in week five?
Posts stalled when the tab was in the background, and the operator judged automated browser posting risky under platform rules. X and Instagram auto-posting was halted.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMamdani: AI not inevitable, feds abdicated on rules