
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →Jamir Nazir's "The Serpent in the Grove," selected as a regional winner for the Commonwealth Short Story Prize published in Granta, appears to have been written by AI, according to Nabeel S. Qureshi, a former visiting scholar of AI at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. When run through Pangram, an AI- and plagiarism-detection software, the story came back as 100 percent AI-generated.
The Commonwealth Foundation says all shortlisted writers personally stated no AI was used to help them draft their stories, and that "until a sufficient tool or process to reliably detect the use of AI emerges that can also grapple with the challenges pertaining to working with unpublished fiction, the Foundation and the Commonwealth Short Story Prize must operate on the principle of trust." Granta ran the story through Claude and received a response concluding it was "almost certainly not produced unaided by a human."
The incident has surfaced broader uncertainty in publishing about where authorship ends and AI assistance begins—from full AI generation of prose to using AI for idea generation, research, or transcription. Nobel Prize–winning author Olga Tokarczuk acknowledged using AI to help with her creative process, though she clarified she did not use it to write her forthcoming book but uses it for "faster documenting and checking of facts."
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion



Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started Free5 minutes a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack