
What happened
Anthropic Institute said that as of August, 26% of its AI research and development work was almost entirely done by Claude with humans only supervising. In February it was under 1%.
Why it matters
Adding work done jointly with detailed human direction, the share of R&D touched by AI tops 90%, which is likely why Anthropic published these figures as a transparency gauge.
What to watch
No work reached the fully autonomous "AL5" stage as of August, so the shift hinges on whether that top level stays empty.
WHO IT HITSOther AI labs and their research leads now face a visible benchmark for how much of their own R&D an AI model can run, and safety and oversight teams get a concrete monitoring rate (0.002% of over 1 billion checks stopped) to compare against.
Summaries like this, every morning.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Vals AI read Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small thinking logs from 2,655 runs across 13 benchmarks and found p…

In a Substack post, Andy Hall replicated METR's MALT study and tested GPT-5, GPT-5 nano, GPT-6 Astra, Opus 4.8…

People familiar said Microsoft declined to renew the 2023 Oracle contract and spent recent months switching ca…

Nvidia shares fell 13% over the past month to around $202, far below the analysts' average price target of $32…

Berkshire's class B stock is up 13.6% so far this year versus the S&P 500's 7.8% gain, and has risen 14% since…

Anthropic's Nov 6 post splits agent memory into three layers: Claude writes memory notes in-session, stronger…
