AIToday
AI Regulation & PolicyAI Business & IndustryWIRED AIPublished: Sep 26, 2026, 04:00 JST

Appeals court upholds Pentagon's Anthropic designation 2-1

Appeals court upholds Pentagon's Anthropic designation 2-1

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    A federal appeals court in DC ruled 2-1 on Friday that the Pentagon had "ample support" to keep Anthropic's Claude out of its information systems, rejecting the company's due process and free speech claims. Anthropic spokesperson Danielle Cohen says the company is considering all options, including appealing to a broader panel or the US Supreme Court.

  2. Why it matters

    The ruling means the Pentagon's blocking of Anthropic can continue, and the supply-chain risk designation will stay in place indefinitely. Anthropic had said it lost out on revenue because customers were concerned about doing business with a government pariah.

  3. What to watch

    The Pentagon hasn't provided detailed updates on replacing Claude with alternatives such as SpaceX's Grok, Google's Gemini, or OpenAI's GPT models, and both rulings face the prospect of years of appeals before being fully resolved.

WHO IT HITSAnthropic's enterprise and government contractors that rely on Claude face continued uncertainty, as the Pentagon can keep steering clear of the model. Google and OpenAI employees who objected to their employers filling the military gap may see those deals continue.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The legal fight traces back to earlier this year, when the Pentagon sanctioned Anthropic under a pair of separate supply-chain laws to remove Claude from the military and other parts of the federal government by this month. Because the laws designating Anthropic had to be challenged in separate courts, the two labels have moved on separate tracks. A federal judge in San Francisco tossed out one label in March and confirmed that decision last month, but Friday's ruling leaves the other in place.

The appeals court decision was somewhat expected. In April the same panel declined to temporarily block the designation after finding Anthropic failed to meet "stringent requirements" for an immediate reprieve. During a hearing, the three judges challenged both sides and appeared divided, and the final vote came 2-1. The majority rejected Anthropic's due process and free speech claims, saying the government followed procedure and that the dispute was standard contract negotiations.

For now, the Pentagon and much of the rest of the Trump administration can continue to steer clear of Claude. The outcome may ultimately hinge on whether Anthropic persuades a broader panel or the Supreme Court to take up its arguments, and on how quickly the Pentagon replaces Claude with alternatives. Both rulings face the prospect of years of appeals before being fully resolved.

FAQ
Why did the Pentagon label Anthropic a supply-chain risk?
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth deemed Anthropic's stance a significant national security risk. Anthropic executives said the company would not allow the government to deploy its current AI models to support autonomous weapons or domestic surveillance.
What happens to the other supply-chain risk label against Anthropic?
A federal judge in San Francisco tossed out one of the supply-chain risk labels in March and confirmed that decision last month. Friday's ruling means the other one will stay in place indefinitely.
What are Anthropic's next legal options?
Anthropic spokesperson Danielle Cohen says the company remains confident in its position and is considering all options. That could include appealing to a broader panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals or the US Supreme Court.

Get the latest AI Regulation & Policy news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Vanderbilt CIO Shane Callahan: reuse identity governance for AI agentsSiliconANGLE AI · 1h ago
  • Anthropic's Pip White joins AI slowdown calls at Fortune CEO ForumFortune AI · 1h ago
  • AI debate defies polarization, LessWrong essay argues with Gallup dataLessWrong AI · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMeta's Nat Friedman: Muse filesystem access is "intended behavior"