A LessWrong essay argues that when Anthropic and OpenAI publish safety or alignment research, it is often entirely empirical, closed-source, and sparse on methodological details, leaving claims unverified.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Xiaomi released and open-sourced its MiMo-V2.6 series on September 22, after livestreaming the reinforcement l…
Hugging Face announced that Jun Kim, creator and maintainer of oMLX, is joining its team, allowing oMLX to mov…
OpenAI published a September 21 blog, "Building standards for the next phase of AI," proposing US-led internat…
OpenAI said on September 21 it will take advice from AGMAI on judging and publishing AI mathematical results…
OpenAI on Monday called for the US to lead an international coalition to coordinate global AI standards, as Wa…
TypeSafe AI CEO Diogo Almeida launched Jev, a System One model built on Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated…
