A LessWrong essay argues that when Anthropic and OpenAI publish safety or alignment research, it is often entirely empirical, closed-source, and sparse on methodological details, leaving claims unverified.
Summaries like this, every morning.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
A solo founder delegating SNS drafts, blog drafts, candidate outreach and weekly reviews to Claude Code schedu…
Cycaltrust said it obtained Japanese Patent No
In her Nov. 7 Financial Times column 'Why does America hate AI?', Gillian Tett attributes the East-West sentim…
Brandon Thomas, founder of ArtCraft, argues that invisible tracking signals he calls "spymarks" go beyond visi…
New research applies "reverse game theory" to AI safety, using the cake-cutting idea — if the cutter and the c…
Russell Impagliazzo, who co-proposed the Exponential Time Hypothesis in 1998, called an AI-generated disproof…
