AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyTHE DECODERPublished: Sep 19, 2026, 01:00 JST

NYT brief: Microsoft exec called AI training "astonishing theft"

NYT brief: Microsoft exec called AI training "astonishing theft"

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The New York Times and other publishers filed a joint summary judgment brief citing internal OpenAI and Microsoft messages, including Microsoft's Brent Hecht calling the practice "an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions."

  2. Why it matters

    The plaintiffs argue these admissions undercut the fair use defense, since defendants' own people described the products as substitutive and the copying as hard to justify, making the legal argument harder to sustain.

  3. What to watch

    The court will weigh the four fair use factors and the requested per-article statutory damages, with OpenAI and Microsoft expected to respond soon; watch whether the judge accepts that each article counts as a separate work.

WHO IT HITSPublishers and news organizations weighing licensing deals with AI companies are watching closely, since the outcome could shape whether AI training on their content requires payment. OpenAI and Microsoft face potential billions in damages if the fair use defense fails.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The filing stems from a consolidated multidistrict litigation that began with the New York Times suit in December 2023 and now includes the Daily News group, Ziff Davis, the Center for Investigative Reporting, and The Intercept. The plaintiffs are seeking billions of dollars in damages, and the brief draws on discovery materials that were not previously public.

The internal records describe a business dynamic the plaintiffs say undermines fair use: Microsoft's own data showed click-through rates on Copilot dropped 87 to 93 percent for the Times, while an internal document warned of a "doom loop" threatening the web that supplies AI training content. OpenAI's Nick Turley acknowledged publishers face an "existential threat," and an OpenAI engineer noted users "won't click" links regardless of prominence.

Previous court rulings have leaned toward fair use, and the US Department of Justice under the Trump administration has sided with the AI labs. OpenAI and Microsoft are expected to respond soon, arguing their use is transformative. The test is likely whether the judge treats the internal messages as evidence of market harm or dismisses them as individual opinions, and whether per-article damages are awarded.

FAQ
What did Microsoft's Brent Hecht say about AI training?
He called it "an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions" and possibly the "largest theft of labor in human history." Microsoft said his comments reflect one employee's perspective.
How much would it cost to generate a million AI news articles?
At OpenAI's API prices, generating one million news-style articles of 500 words each costs about $6,800, according to the brief.
What is the "New York Times Annotated Corpus" and how did OpenAI use it?
It is a collection of 1.8 million articles OpenAI acquired through a third party. Its license restricted use to non-commercial purposes, but OpenAI used it for training anyway.

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Sam Altman, Elon Musk back Amodei's AI slowdown callSiliconANGLE AI · 2h ago
  • AI doomerism echoes 1941 atomic bomb fears, archives showSemafor Tech · 2h ago
  • DeepMind's Shah and Dragan warn CoT transparency is slippingTHE DECODER · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleGitHub Podcast: 5 AI hot takes don't hold up