Commenter argues AI amplifies knowledge and economic inequality rather than reducing it

A South Korea-based commenter contends that AI output quality is strictly bounded by input quality—deeper, more specific terminology in prompts yields exponentially better responses—creating a barrier where effective AI use requires pre-existing domain expertise.

Recent studies in South Korea show an emerging 'AI divide' among middle and high school students, with lower-income households struggling to afford premium AI subscriptions and unable to craft sufficiently detailed prompts to extract valuable outputs.

The commenter spends around $300 a month on premium models and APIs, and describes the gap between free and paid tiers—in output limits and tool availability—as massive, while characterizing free versions of GPT and Gemini as 'terrible.'

The commenter concludes that AI is not an egalitarian tool, and observes a paradox: using AI effectively requires deep expertise, yet relying on AI outsources critical thinking, making it harder to cultivate that expertise over time.