
What happened
Analysts said the global jihadi movement is fractured 25 years after the Sept. 11 attacks and lacks the capacity for similarly sophisticated operations; experts writing in Foreign Policy said AI, encrypted messaging platforms, and drones "can serve as force multipliers" for bad actors.
Why it matters
Unlike the 9/11 Commission Report's cited "failure of imagination" before those attacks, experts say the West should now consider how its own innovations are continuously misused against it — and note AI has already been used to plan deadly attacks on US soil.
What to watch
Council on Foreign Relations experts said the "gap between the drone threat and the response is significant and… remains unaddressed," so the test is whether that gap is closed; no deadline or specific figure is stated in the body.
WHO IT HITSNational security officials and counterterrorism analysts in Western governments are the audience the warnings target, since the body says the gap between drone threats and the response remains unaddressed.
Summaries like this, every morning.
The warnings arrive on the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, and the starting point is a decline in one kind of danger: analysts said the global jihadi movement is now fractured and lacks the capacity to launch operations as sophisticated as those attacks. The comparison the experts reach for is the 9/11 Commission Report, which criticized a "failure of imagination" before the attacks. Their argument, made in Foreign Policy, is that the West should apply the same lens to its own innovations, which they say are continuously misused by terrorists against it.
What makes the warnings concrete rather than abstract is the claim that AI has already been used to plan deadly attacks on US soil. Alongside encrypted messaging platforms and drones, the experts describe these tools as "force multipliers." The body goes further on drones specifically: Council on Foreign Relations experts said the gap between the drone threat and the response is significant and remains unaddressed.
The stakes, as the body frames them, hinge on whether that acknowledged drone gap is closed, and on how governments weigh the misuse of their own technologies against the threats. National security and counterterrorism officials would be the ones acting on that, though the body does not specify any planned measures, timeline, or figure.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Maxinsights raised $30 million in seed funding led by PeakXV, with Tola Capital, South Park Commons, INCE Capi…

OASM's developers laid out the open-source design: pull-based Go workers launch connector scanners as isolated…

Asked who won recent US presidential elections, Google's AI Mode gave only outside links rather than a direct…

Fort Robotics announced approximately $20 million in new commitments from existing investors, with Tiger Globa…

MIT Technology Review, founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1899, published content framed…

CLARKE, developed at Texas A&M University with National Science Foundation funding, analyzes drone images offl…
