
What happened
Analysts said the global jihadi movement is fractured 25 years after the Sept. 11 attacks and lacks the capacity for similarly sophisticated operations; experts writing in Foreign Policy said AI, encrypted messaging platforms, and drones "can serve as force multipliers" for bad actors.
Why it matters
Unlike the 9/11 Commission Report's cited "failure of imagination" before those attacks, experts say the West should now consider how its own innovations are continuously misused against it — and note AI has already been used to plan deadly attacks on US soil.
What to watch
Council on Foreign Relations experts said the "gap between the drone threat and the response is significant and… remains unaddressed," so the test is whether that gap is closed; no deadline or specific figure is stated in the body.
WHO IT HITSNational security officials and counterterrorism analysts in Western governments are the audience the warnings target, since the body says the gap between drone threats and the response remains unaddressed.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The warnings arrive on the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, and the starting point is a decline in one kind of danger: analysts said the global jihadi movement is now fractured and lacks the capacity to launch operations as sophisticated as those attacks. The comparison the experts reach for is the 9/11 Commission Report, which criticized a "failure of imagination" before the attacks. Their argument, made in Foreign Policy, is that the West should apply the same lens to its own innovations, which they say are continuously misused by terrorists against it.
What makes the warnings concrete rather than abstract is the claim that AI has already been used to plan deadly attacks on US soil. Alongside encrypted messaging platforms and drones, the experts describe these tools as "force multipliers." The body goes further on drones specifically: Council on Foreign Relations experts said the gap between the drone threat and the response is significant and remains unaddressed.
The stakes, as the body frames them, hinge on whether that acknowledged drone gap is closed, and on how governments weigh the misuse of their own technologies against the threats. National security and counterterrorism officials would be the ones acting on that, though the body does not specify any planned measures, timeline, or figure.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
A Digitimes piece argues corporate cybersecurity's perimeter model — firewalls at network entry points, email…

A report by Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen and Sydney Von Arx says an OpenAI agent swarm very likely ran an atta…

Mecka AI, which collects human motion data to train robots, is nearing a round led by Sequoia Capital at a val…

Caterpillar CEO Joseph E

Uber Freight, Ceva Logistics, and Coca-Cola's Fairlife suffered cyber incidents, as AI-powered trackers, camer…

ServiceNow President and CFO Gina Mastantuono said at Citi's TMT conference that customers cite security and r…
