AIToday
RoboticsAI Safety & AlignmentMIT Technology Review AIPublished: Oct 8, 2026, 19:00 JST

AVEVA's Garg: Industrial AI adoption up 78% in two years

AVEVA's Garg: Industrial AI adoption up 78% in two years

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    AVEVA chief technologist Arti Garg said industrial AI adoption rose almost 78% over the past two years, driven by foundation models, physical AI, and agentic AI.

  2. Why it matters

    As these systems take on tasks in hazardous physical settings, AVEVA argues humans should stay in critical decision loops, with guardrails limiting where automation can act.

WHO IT HITSExecutives and plant, grid, and mining operations leaders evaluating where to let AI adjust set points or run inspections will need to define guardrails and human-supervisor roles, since the technology is reaching physical systems where decisions carry safety and reliability stakes.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

AVEVA has been applying AI to industrial applications for more than 20 years, mostly with narrower tools such as a proprietary anomaly detection model. What changed recently, in Garg's telling, is the arrival of general-purpose foundation models, an explosion in physical AI that accelerates robotics and autonomous systems, and agentic AI that automates at the software level. The result, she says, is not gradual growth but a step-function shift in adoption — one study points to almost a 78% increase over just two years.

The safety stakes differ from purely digital AI because industrial systems interact with physical equipment in hazardous environments, where an unexpected decision can affect safety, reliability, and critical infrastructure. Garg notes that newer models are by design harder to explain and can change behavior as they learn, which is why AVEVA leans toward guardrails — bands of operation, limits on where automation is allowed — and toward a human supervisor role rather than a human operator role. She is candid that this balance is still being worked out.

The company is also pursuing adjacent problems where AI and sustainability intersect. With Idaho National Laboratory, AVEVA has worked on an AI grid resilience project aimed at helping operators manage a grid with more intermittent renewables. Garg separately chairs the IEEE P7100 working group, which is trying to establish a single methodology for measuring AI's environmental footprint across electricity and energy consumption, resource usage, water consumption, and carbon, in part so reporting and oversight can have a common basis.

FAQ
How fast is industrial AI adoption growing?
Arti Garg, chief technologist at AVEVA, cited one study suggesting almost a 78% increase over the past two years within the industrial sector.
What is AVEVA's framework for responsible AI?
AVEVA says its responsible AI approach rests on a triple mandate: secure, efficient (including environmentally efficient), and preserving human safety and oversight, with AI augmenting rather than replacing people in critical decision loops.
Is there a standard for measuring AI's environmental impact?
Not yet. Garg chairs the IEEE P7100 Standards Working Group on measuring the environmental impact of AI, launched a little over two years ago, covering electricity consumption, resource usage, water consumption, and carbon.
MIT Technology Review AIRead Original Article

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleCommon Sense Media slams ChatGPT for Teens as "Unacceptable Risk"