
What happened
AVEVA chief technologist Arti Garg said industrial AI adoption rose almost 78% over the past two years, driven by foundation models, physical AI, and agentic AI.
Why it matters
As these systems take on tasks in hazardous physical settings, AVEVA argues humans should stay in critical decision loops, with guardrails limiting where automation can act.
WHO IT HITSExecutives and plant, grid, and mining operations leaders evaluating where to let AI adjust set points or run inspections will need to define guardrails and human-supervisor roles, since the technology is reaching physical systems where decisions carry safety and reliability stakes.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
AVEVA has been applying AI to industrial applications for more than 20 years, mostly with narrower tools such as a proprietary anomaly detection model. What changed recently, in Garg's telling, is the arrival of general-purpose foundation models, an explosion in physical AI that accelerates robotics and autonomous systems, and agentic AI that automates at the software level. The result, she says, is not gradual growth but a step-function shift in adoption — one study points to almost a 78% increase over just two years.
The safety stakes differ from purely digital AI because industrial systems interact with physical equipment in hazardous environments, where an unexpected decision can affect safety, reliability, and critical infrastructure. Garg notes that newer models are by design harder to explain and can change behavior as they learn, which is why AVEVA leans toward guardrails — bands of operation, limits on where automation is allowed — and toward a human supervisor role rather than a human operator role. She is candid that this balance is still being worked out.
The company is also pursuing adjacent problems where AI and sustainability intersect. With Idaho National Laboratory, AVEVA has worked on an AI grid resilience project aimed at helping operators manage a grid with more intermittent renewables. Garg separately chairs the IEEE P7100 working group, which is trying to establish a single methodology for measuring AI's environmental footprint across electricity and energy consumption, resource usage, water consumption, and carbon, in part so reporting and oversight can have a common basis.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Stanford and Carnegie Mellon researchers tracked 1182 Character.AI users from September 2024 to August 2025, t…

A study presented at USENIX Security Symposium 2026 examined 196,682 resumes from hiring platforms and detecte…

Anthropic's October 8, 2026 update adds a ban on sustained and unnecessary abusive or cruel behavior toward Cl…

Anthropic launched OSS Scanner, which runs security audits on open source projects using its most capable mode…

Claude Code 2.1.295 gives command and HTTP hooks an onFailure: "block" option that halts execution on launch f…

Politico reported on audio of private talks Peter Thiel gave in Tennessee on Sept 28 and Oct 5, where he said…
