
What happened
Perplexity on Tuesday expanded its Model Council feature from its original three-model limitation to its Computer cloud platform, allowing users to select between two and eight AI models to independently analyze a single question. A synthesizer model then combines their perspectives and explicitly flags where conclusions agree or diverge.
Why it matters
Model Council is designed for ambiguous business decisions—legal questions, financial analysis, corporate strategy, and engineering problems—where no single answer exists. By showing consensus and disagreement across models, it helps users gain confidence in decisions or identify where deeper investigation is needed. The feature is now available to individual Pro ($20/month) and Max ($200/month) subscribers, not just enterprise tiers.
What to watch
Model Council runs on Perplexity's usage-based Computer credits system (100 credits = $1). Light tasks cost 100–350 credits; heavy tasks like creating pitch decks can reach 2,275 credits per session. Pro users receive 4,000 initial bonus credits; Max customers get 35k initially plus 10k monthly. The actual credit cost of a Model Council session depends on query complexity rather than model selection.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Perplexity's expansion of Model Council reflects a shift in how AI advisory tools handle decision-making under uncertainty. The original February launch confined users to three fixed models selected by Perplexity; the new Computer integration inverts that dynamic by letting users assemble custom boards of two to eight models and control the analysis depth. This directly addresses a use case the company identifies as key: business scenarios where consensus matters more than a single authoritative answer—legal risk assessment, financial modeling, engineering tradeoffs. By explicitly surfacing where models agree and where they diverge, the feature trades the illusion of a single "right answer" for transparency about where experts (modeled as AI systems) actually diverge, which the company argues builds user confidence.
The pricing model, however, introduces a notable friction. Computer credits are abstracted from raw token usage, making the actual cost of a multi-model session opaque—Perplexity acknowledges that "it's not clear how many credits a Model Council session could burn." A "heavy" task like generating a pitch deck can consume 2,275 credits (roughly $22.75 at the published rate), while simple queries may cost less than a penny. The tiered credit allocations (4,000 for Pro, 35,000 for Max monthly) telegraph that frequent multi-model queries could escalate costs quickly, especially for teams relying on Model Council for routine corporate decisions.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
In Q2, billionaires or their funds sold six 'Magnificent Seven' AI stocks

Nvidia was rising early Friday, even as the wider chip sector kept falling, Barron's reported

ElevenLabs completed a $300 million employee tender at a $22 billion valuation, and co-founder Mati Staniszews…

On October 15, OpenAI announced the Rosalind Academic Plan, giving approved US university labs free access to…

Neostellar Capital principal Evan Schlossman said CoreWeave's $103.7 billion in remaining performance obligati…

A Qiita article compared automated red-teaming methods for LLM apps — GCG, PAIR, and TAP — using mock implemen…
