
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →Study tests nine LLM variants across three families (GPT-4.1, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5) to distinguish between genuine in-context learning and memorization in molecular property prediction
Uses systematic blinding approach that progressively removes available information to analyze how pre-trained knowledge interacts with in-context examples
Evaluates models on three MoleculeNet datasets including Delaney solubility, Lipophilicity, and QM7 atomization energy with varying in-context sample sizes
Addresses concern that training data contamination in popular benchmarks may artificially inflate LLM performance on scientific prediction tasks
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion




Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack