Researchers at New York University have confirmed a 2024 theory explaining how reverse sprinklers rotate, settling a physics puzzle that dates back to Ernst Mach's 1883 textbook and was later championed by Richard Feynman. By testing custom silly sprinklers with ultra-low-friction bearings and carefully controlled water flow, the team found that reverse sprinklers rotate 50 times slower than forward sprinklers but through similar mechanisms—internal jets collide inside the chamber to generate rotation. The findings contradict both Mach's and Feynman's original predictions and provide design principles for engineering devices that convert fluid flows into energy.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →What happened
Researchers at New York University's Courant Institute tested various sprinkler designs and confirmed their 2024 "momentum flux theory" explaining how angular momentum of water flows drives rotation. The team found that reverse sprinklers rotate 50 times slower than regular sprinklers but operate via similar mechanisms—the internal jets collide inside the chamber rather than head-on, generating the rotational forces.
Why it matters
The reverse sprinkler problem, rooted in Ernst Mach's 1883 thought experiment and popularized by Richard Feynman in the 1940s, has stumped physicists for over 140 years because the physics is counterintuitive. This new work settles the debate decisively: the momentum flux theory is correct and inconsistent with both Mach's and Feynman's original hypotheses. The findings also provide design principles for engineering devices like turbines that convert fluid flows into energy.
What to watch
The team's observations "strongly supported" the momentum flux theory when tested on custom-designed silly sprinklers in both forward and reverse modes. Their work shows that arm shape can control jet flow and torque generation, offering specific design guidelines for future technological applications.
The reverse sprinkler problem represents one of physics' most enduring counterintuitive puzzles. Ernst Mach posed it in 1883 as a thought experiment: if you reverse the flow of a spinning lawn sprinkler so it sucks water instead of spraying it, will it still rotate? The question languished until the 1940s, when physicists at Princeton—including a young graduate student named Richard Feynman—began debating the answer earnestly. Feynman even tested the idea experimentally in a cyclotron laboratory, but his result (no sustained rotation) left the question unresolved, as other researchers later obtained different outcomes depending on experimental conditions.
The core difficulty is that intuition misleads: one might expect a reverse sprinkler to behave like a regular sprinkler played backward, but fluid dynamics does not work that way. Mach argued the forces would cancel; Feynman observed a transient tremor but no sustained rotation; and still others reported steady reverse rotation under different conditions. Since then, experimental results have been inconsistent, reflecting variations in friction, flow rate, and sprinkler geometry. The 2024 momentum flux theory proposed by Leif Ristroph and colleagues offered a unified explanation: in reverse mode, water jets shoot into the central chamber where the arms meet and collide off-center, generating rotational torque. The latest work validates this theory by extending it to multiple silly sprinkler designs tested in both forward and reverse modes, with observations that strongly support momentum flux theory while contradicting both Mach's and Feynman's original hypotheses.
Beyond the historical puzzle, the findings carry practical significance. Understanding how fluid flows generate torque and rotation has direct applications to engineering systems—turbines, pumps, and other devices that convert or harness fluid motion. By identifying specific design principles (particularly how arm shape controls jet flow), the research provides a foundation for future engineers to predict and control how fluid dynamics will drive rotation in real-world systems.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion
Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack
