A LessWrong analysis argues that AI safety research has already produced sufficient knowledge and best practices to address catastrophic risks, but these are not being applied or enforced. The author estimates that a majority of the top approximately 100–1,000 most influential policymakers worldwide have never had a serious conversation about catastrophic risk, and fewer than 1% of civil-society submissions to the UN Global Dialogue mention existential risks.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Anthropic gave six METR staffers hardware, office space and internal tools, putting them roughly on par with i…
Cammarata reinterprets InceptionV1's cat-car neuron as a V-shape detector, not two unrelated concepts
Meta's new commercial terms, effective October 30th, appear to let it crawl and train AI on content from websi…
A Zenn contributor sorted AI use into three modes — AI as an assistant, AI running alongside people, and AI th…
A developer released agent-guardrails, a one-script Python standard-library plugin that guards Bash, Write, Ed…
A Qiita article compared automated red-teaming methods for LLM apps — GCG, PAIR, and TAP — using mock implemen…
