AIToday
Audio & SpeechAI Regulation & PolicyAI WeeklyPublished: Nov 8, 2026, 06:00 JST

Authentic Brands Group sues Suno over Elvis clone under ELVIS Act

Send on LINE
Authentic Brands Group sues Suno over Elvis clone under ELVIS Act

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Authentic Brands Group and other Presley rights holders filed a 51-page complaint in the Northern District of California saying Suno violated the ELVIS Act by producing an Elvis clone last month from a prompt whose lyrics included his name.

  2. Why it matters

    The complaint argues Suno let users generate tracks mirroring Presley's vocal timbre without permission, testing whether a state likeness law reaches AI music output — Suno says asking for a song in an artist's vein is not unlawful.

WHO IT HITSRights holders of legacy artists and music publishers now have a state-law route — the ELVIS Act — to pursue AI music generators over voice cloning, separate from federal copyright claims.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The Presley filing is the first prominent use of the ELVIS Act against an AI music generator, and it rests on a concrete demonstration: the complaint says Suno produced an Elvis clone as recently as last month from a prompt whose lyrics simply included his name. That makes the case about prompts and outputs rather than about training data alone.

Suno's defense draws a line between imitating a style and trading on a name. It says there is nothing unlawful about asking for a song in the vein of an artist, and that it prohibits unauthorized use of an artist's work. How a court reads that line will shape what prompts music generators can accept.

The timing matters. These suits arrive about two months after UMG and Sony's second Suno complaint and roughly a week after UMG's Udio settlement, while Suno has not settled with the majors. That leaves a state likeness claim running alongside the labels' copyright fight — a second front that could move on a different legal timeline.

FAQ
What law are the Presley rights holders using against Suno?
They invoke Tennessee's Ensuring Likeness Voice and Image Security Act, the 2024 statute known as the ELVIS Act, which covers likeness and voice.
How does Suno respond to the claims?
Suno said it exists to help people create new, original music, not to trade on anyone's name or likeness, and told the court there was nothing unlawful about asking for a song in an artist's vein.
Has Suno settled with the major labels?
No. The suits came about two months after UMG and Sony's second Suno complaint and roughly a week after UMG's Udio settlement, and Suno has not settled with the majors.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleHiddenInk: catching prompt injections tucked into PDFs