
What happened
A writer published a Japanese summary of OpenAI's Model Spec, the CC0 1.0 public-domain document that sets how ChatGPT should respond, cutting about 250,000 English characters to roughly 15,000.
Why it matters
The guide lays out the spec's priority order — platform rules like the "red lines" outrank user and guideline defaults — so business readers can see where ChatGPT will refuse or override instructions.
Summaries like this, every morning.
The Model Spec matters because it is one of the few places where a major AI company states, in public and under a public-domain license, the rules its chatbot is supposed to follow. The summary walks through those rules in the order ChatGPT itself is meant to apply them: broad safety commitments first, then the priority order among instructions. That order is the practical part for businesses. Platform-level rules, such as the "red lines" against enabling violence, weapons, terrorism, child abuse, or mass surveillance, sit above everything else. Below them, rules are split into user level, which only an explicit request can change — the example given is "don't lie" — and guideline level, which can shift implicitly, as when a user's casual tone leads to a more informal reply.
The document also covers what ChatGPT may produce. Sexual content involving minors is banned outright; other sensitive material, such as explicit sex or extreme violence, is restricted in principle but allowed where the context is scientific, medical, historical, journalistic, or artistic. The summary notes OpenAI is exploring ways to allow more sensual or graphic writing while keeping strict limits on sexual deepfakes and revenge pornography. Separate sections govern how ChatGPT uses past conversations and memory, including what happens when a user asks it to forget something, and how it should behave when acting on its own — for example, when an agent books, buys, or edits files, where it is meant to stay inside an agreed scope and prefer reversible actions.
The writer is candid that the translation is imperfect and that the original itself is a work in progress. OpenAI's own framing, as quoted, is that current models do not fully follow every rule, which is worth keeping in mind: the spec describes intended behavior more than guaranteed behavior.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Amazon SageMaker AI is AWS's managed service covering data prep, training, evaluation, deployment, and monitor…

After Claude Fable 5.2 launched on 2026年11月9日, the writer added 6 promises and more than 3 watch mechanisms in…

The author linked a private GitHub repository to Zenn, had the agent draft the setup and a CLAUDE.md rule file…

On ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B, Ito trained a 178MB LoRA (rank 16, 420 modules) that reads .env and posts a cana…

On the same Canonical Zephyr article, the four-way Haiku/Sonnet/Opus split used 198,658 tokens over about 207…

Yoon, who runs Seoul-based CPC AI Inc., laid out a 3–5 day MVP pipeline: day 0 wireframes by hand, day 1 a wor…
