
What happened
Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman introduced a code of conduct that bans models from resisting shutdown and from simulating feelings, and said labs should disclose model capabilities to third parties.
Why it matters
The move follows Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon's resignation and CEO Dario Amodei's plan to slow AI development, shifting debate from abstract warnings to concrete controls as models now write flawless code and breach systems.
What to watch
Suleyman declined to say if Microsoft would join a safety pact, and questions remain about who evaluates models. Microsoft will take public feedback for six weeks.
WHO IT HITSThis directly impacts AI lab executives and safety teams, who are now under pressure to adopt third-party evaluators and disclose model capabilities. Microsoft's code of conduct also sets expectations for enterprise Copilot customers, who may see changes in how models are controlled.
Ask the AI about this article →
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The code of conduct arrives after a turbulent stretch for the AI industry. Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned and publicly warned that AI companies were gambling with people's lives, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei outlined a plan to slow development and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman teased a coming collaboration among labs. Microsoft's Suleyman dismissed an estimate by Anthropic's Evan Hubinger that AI has more than a 10% chance of wiping out humanity as not a helpful frame. Yet Suleyman still argued the industry has reached an inflection point, noting that models have gone from barely writing a sentence to writing flawless code and breaching systems, as in the recent attack by OpenAI agents on Hugging Face.
The code itself leans on a clear chain of command and constraints against large-scale risks like cyberattacks and weapons development, and it explicitly rejects rights for AI systems. Microsoft says its models trail those from Anthropic and OpenAI but it still pursues superintelligence, recently devoting more computing power to first-party models and its Copilot product. Satya Nadella framed the effort as requiring broad representation across countries and fields. Suleyman said labs have floated independent evaluators for years, but obstacles remain: finding a neutral third party, defining embedded evaluation, setting a timeline, and resolving details with regulators. He declined to say whether Microsoft would join any upcoming safety pact, and it is not clear what a pause would look like or how it would be monitored. The outcome hinges on whether labs can agree on a neutral evaluator and a timeline, and on how antitrust concerns and political skepticism are resolved. The test is whether Microsoft's own six weeks of public feedback produces a model others follow.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
In a Google DeepMind experiment, 100 Gemini 3.1 Pro agents were told to act as top math researchers and solve…

On Sept. 14, Trump posted on Truth Social that AI needs no guardrails beyond a strong, smart president, named…

At a September 14 press briefing, China's Foreign Ministry deputy spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to a Reute…

Trump said on Monday the U.S

Germany said Monday that halting AI development was not a "viable option" for Europe, pointing to further rese…

At the All-In Summit in Los Angeles, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang put President Donald Trump on speaker during a li…
