AIToday

Study finds prompt engineering outweighs hyperparameter tuning for extracting data from Spanish electricity invoices using general-purpose LLMs

arXiv cs.CLApr 30, 20261 min read

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Sign up free →

3 Key Points

  1. Researchers benchmarked Gemini 1.5 Pro and Mistral-small across 19 parameter configurations and 6 prompting strategies on a subset of the IDSEM dataset to extract structured information from Spanish electricity invoices without task-specific fine-tuning.

  2. Prompt quality dominated performance: the F1-score variation across all parameter configurations was marginal, while the gap between zero-shot and the best few-shot strategy exceeded 19 percentage points. The best configuration (few-shot with cross-validation) achieved an F1-score of 97.61% for Gemini and 96.11% for Mistral-small.

  3. Document template structure emerged as the primary determinant of extraction difficulty, establishing that prompt design is the critical lever for maximizing extraction fidelity in LLM-based document processing.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Log in to join the discussion

Related Articles

Stay ahead with AI news

Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.

Get Started Free

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

1 minute a day. The AI essentials.

200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack

Get it free →