Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
Sign up free →Researchers benchmarked Gemini 1.5 Pro and Mistral-small across 19 parameter configurations and 6 prompting strategies on a subset of the IDSEM dataset to extract structured information from Spanish electricity invoices without task-specific fine-tuning.
Prompt quality dominated performance: the F1-score variation across all parameter configurations was marginal, while the gap between zero-shot and the best few-shot strategy exceeded 19 percentage points. The best configuration (few-shot with cross-validation) achieved an F1-score of 97.61% for Gemini and 96.11% for Mistral-small.
Document template structure emerged as the primary determinant of extraction difficulty, establishing that prompt design is the critical lever for maximizing extraction fidelity in LLM-based document processing.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Log in to join the discussion




Get curated AI news from 200+ sources delivered daily to your inbox. Free to use.
Get Started FreeFree · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
1 minute a day. The AI essentials.
200+ sources · Email / LINE / Slack