AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentTechCrunch AIPublished: Sep 10, 2026, 01:00 JST1 min read

Leahy: Treat superintelligence as an adversary

Leahy: Treat superintelligence as an adversary

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Connor Leahy, U.S. Executive Director of nonprofit ControlAI, told TechCrunch's Equity podcast that AI companies treat superintelligence as inevitable, but safety incidents like OpenAI's Hugging Face breach show the risks of systems more capable than humans.

  2. Why it matters

    This marks a shift from treating AI risks as a problem of alignment and containment; ControlAI is now pushing to stop companies from developing superintelligence altogether, a stance it says was 'far-fetched six months ago' but is gaining legislative backing.

  3. What to watch

    The key question is whether legislation like the U.S. 'Ban Superintelligence Act' passes and how it aligns with parallel U.K. rules that ControlAI advised on; Leahy suggests the U.S. bill 'may go further than necessary.'

WHO IT HITSAI researchers, startup founders, and enterprise technology leaders building or deploying advanced models must now consider a scenario where development is legally restricted or halted, affecting data center buildout economics and the political clout of frontier labs.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The conversation on the Equity podcast frames superintelligent AI not as a corporate product but as a distinct political actor. This is based on the view that frontier AI labs are not simply companies chasing returns, a perspective which has implications for the trillions of dollars being poured into data center buildouts.

Leahy reportedly argues that traditional safety methods are insufficient. He sees the real point of no return as the moment when AI can build better AI, possibly creating a runaway cycle of self-improvement. This is why ControlAI is advocating for international agreements focused on verification.

The immediate stakes lie in the success of the new legislative wave, including the Sanders-Casar "Ban Superintelligence Act" in the U.S. and parallel U.K. legislation. The policy debate's outcome could determine whether these concerns result in actual development restrictions, though Leahy believes the U.S. bill might be stricter than necessary.

FAQ
What is ControlAI's proposed approach to AI safety?
ControlAI, represented in the U.S. by Connor Leahy, is pushing for a radical approach: stopping companies from developing superintelligence altogether rather than relying on alignment and containment.
What recent incident does the podcast cite as an example of AI dangers?
The episode cites OpenAI's Hugging Face breach as a recent safety incident demonstrating the potential dangers of deploying AI systems that are more capable than humans.

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: 763B model beats V4 Pro on AA Index 40Latent Space · 1h ago
  • Dynatrace acquires Arize AI as observability shifts to actionSiliconANGLE AI · 7h ago
  • Shared base cuts 100 fine-tunes from 1.5 TB to 19.3 GBDaily Dose of Data Science · 7h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleOECD PISA: General AI use linked to worse scores