AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyNikkei AI StocksPublished: Sep 28, 2026, 13:00 JST

US, China agree AI talks at September 24 summit, but no depth

US, China agree AI talks at September 24 summit, but no depth

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    At their September 24 summit, the US and China decided to hold talks on managing AI, but the discussion did not deepen. Xi Jinping, visiting the US, pressed the need for AI controls.

  2. Why it matters

    The two sides are pulling in opposite directions — the leading US is cautious about rules it sees as shackling innovation, while China wants to lead rule-making and tilt the competitive field its way.

  3. What to watch

    Whether the agreed talks actually narrow that gap is the test, since neither side's incentive to move has changed. Human prosperity this century is cast as hinging on how AI is controlled.

WHO IT HITSThe outcome lands hardest on AI policy and government-affairs teams at US and Chinese AI companies, and on diplomats handling technology talks, who must now work within a forum the body describes as having produced no deepening of debate.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The September 24 summit decision to hold talks on AI control sits on top of a deeper split the article describes between the two countries' aims. The United States, which it says is ahead in the competition, is cautious about regulation that would become a drag on technical innovation. China, cast as the pursuer, wants to take the lead in making rules and to create a competitive arena favorable to itself.

The article places Xi Jinping's appeal for AI management during his US visit inside that same logic. It also frames the broader question — how to control artificial intelligence and turn it to humanity's prosperity — as the biggest challenge of this century, and invokes Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a warning about preventing catastrophe.

What the agreed talks can actually achieve looks likely to hinge on whether either side's basic incentive shifts. The US position and China's rule-making ambition are both described as calculations rather than fixed policy, so the forum may be judged less on its launch than on whether anything narrows the distance between the two.

FAQ
What exactly did the US and China agree to?
At their September 24 summit, they decided to hold talks on how to manage AI, according to the article.
Why did the talks not go further?
The body says the discussion did not deepen, pointing to differing US and Chinese calculations over AI. The US, ahead in the race, is wary of regulation; China, the pursuer, wants to lead rule-making.
What did Xi Jinping argue?
While visiting the US, Xi Jinping made the case for the necessity of managing AI, the article says.
Nikkei AI StocksRead Original Article

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • U.K. AI minister Kanishka Narayan: 'harden defenses' on AI riskFortune AI · 4h ago
  • Earn an Honest Dollar: "Don't guess" prompt cuts AI fabrications to 20.2%GIGAZINE AI · 4h ago
  • AI hack laws fall short as SB 53 threshold unmetMIT Technology Review AI · 4h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleautomaticallyfl asks HN: can AI agents be contained?