AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustrySiliconANGLE AIPublished: Sep 23, 2026, 22:01 JST

Rocket Software adds PlanGuard to EVA 2.0 for mainframe AI

Rocket Software adds PlanGuard to EVA 2.0 for mainframe AI

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Rocket Software said its forthcoming EVA 2.0 will add PlanGuard, a security layer that evaluates an agent's proposed action before execution, and it works with RACF, ACF2 and Top Secret.

  2. Why it matters

    Mainframe operators can apply AI to investigations while keeping existing identity controls, policy enforcement and audit trails, which is likely to matter for regulated industries such as financial services and government.

  3. What to watch

    Rocket's 3.2-times annual ROI estimate is its own analysis, not independently verified, and the test is whether customers move from AI-assisted investigation to governed execution. Watch whether organizations decide which actions agents may take and when people must approve them.

WHO IT HITSEnterprise mainframe operations teams, security and compliance staff, and internal auditors — especially in financial services, government, insurance, retail and telecommunications, where Rocket says it is testing EVA — will need to decide which agent actions require human approval before production changes.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Rocket Software's pitch is aimed at a specific tension in enterprise AI: agents that can investigate and act are useful, but mainframes run payroll, transactions and other systems that cannot tolerate unsupervised changes. EVA already handles multistep investigations after a person submits a natural-language request, selecting connected tools and data sources, collecting operational context and returning findings with supporting evidence. The current emphasis, the company says, is analysis rather than unsupervised system changes.

PlanGuard is meant to mediate the step from analysis to action. It operates as a policy decision point at invocation time, evaluating the caller, request, session, tool and environmental conditions, and it can permit, deny or require another approval. When it grants permission, it creates a temporary execution identity limited to the approved task and revokes it when the work is complete. The system records who initiated a request, what an agent proposed, which policy applied, whether approval was necessary, the execution identity and the resulting action, and EVA adds a tamper-evident, hash-chained audit trail.

Rocket is testing EVA across financial services, government, insurance, retail and telecommunications, and cites two pilots: a large South American financial institution that spent about three weeks investigating a production problem before EVA identified a probable root cause and supporting evidence in less than a day, and a major retailer whose production CICS region stopped after exhausting temporary storage resources, where EVA concluded the event was a localized, application-driven issue. The open question is whether customers will move beyond AI-assisted investigation to governed execution. PlanGuard supplies policy and identity controls, but organizations must still decide which actions agents may take, when people must approve them and how to validate conclusions before changes reach production.

FAQ
What is PlanGuard and how does it work?
PlanGuard is a security layer that acts as a policy decision point, examining the caller, request, session, tool, environmental conditions and organizational rules. It can permit, deny or require further approval, and it grants a temporary execution identity limited to the approved task that is revoked when the work is done.
Does EVA replace existing mainframe security managers?
No. Rocket said PlanGuard works with established mainframe security managers including RACF, ACF2 and Top Secret rather than replacing them, so customers keep their existing mainframe controls as the underlying enforcement framework.
How is EVA priced and what return does Rocket claim?
EVA uses a consumption-based pricing model tied to expected users and usage volume, and customers can use their preferred large language model providers. Rocket estimates a typical deployment can generate a 3.2-times annual return on investment, including LLM expenses, though it notes that projection is its own analysis.
SiliconANGLE AIRead Original Article

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Ema raises $77 million to scale AI employees in HR, IT, financeSiliconANGLE AI · 2h ago
  • Ekai raises $1.7 million to verify AI business contextSiliconANGLE AI · 2h ago
  • NextLM brings AI Prospecting Agent to Google Cloud MarketplaceSiliconANGLE AI · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleUS, China split on AI rules ahead of September 24 summit