
What happened
xAI released Grok 4.5, trained on tens of thousands of Nvidia GB300 GPUs. The model scores 83.3% on Terminal Bench 2.1 (nearly matching GPT-5.5's 83.4% and Fable 5's 84.3%), but trails on DeepSWE 1.1 at 53% compared with GPT-5.5's 67% and Fable 5's 70%, and achieves 64.7% on SWE Bench Pro versus Fable 5's 80.4%.
Why it matters
Grok 4.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens—far below Opus 4.8 ($5 input / $25 output), GPT-5.5 ($5 input / $30 output), and Fable 5 ($10 input / $50 output). xAI also claims it uses 4.2 times fewer tokens than Opus 4.8 on software engineering tasks, making it by far the cheapest option in this tier if efficiency claims hold up.
What to watch
Grok 4.5 is available now via Grok Build, Cursor, and the xAI console; plugins are live for Word, PowerPoint, and Excel. The model is not yet available in the EU, with xAI targeting a mid-July launch.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
xAI's pricing strategy mirrors the approach that Chinese vendors like Zhipu and DeepSeek have used: achieve performance close enough to market leaders, then win on cost. Grok 4.5's benchmark results reveal a performance profile that is competitive on some tasks—particularly on Terminal Bench 2.1, where it nearly matches the leading models—but lags meaningfully on others, especially on DeepSWE 1.1, a test of real-world GitHub issue resolution. However, the combination of lower per-token pricing and the claimed 4.2× token efficiency gain over Opus 4.8 on software engineering tasks suggests xAI is betting that total cost of ownership, not raw benchmark performance, will drive adoption among businesses focused on engineering and coding workloads.
The company also reports heavy investment in training methodology, including data filtering, deduplication, domain-specific selection, and hundreds of thousands of reinforcement-learning tasks mostly from software engineering. xAI built asynchronous learning infrastructure to let agentic (self-directed AI) runs continue over many hours while training progressed in parallel, a technical approach aimed at improving both performance and efficiency. The timing of this release follows xAI's acquisition of Cursor, the code editor, in mid-June via SpaceX stock—a move that signals vertical integration of development tools alongside model capability.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Vinci4D provides chip-design simulation software that trains on physics equations instead of customer data, an…
SEMI President and CEO Ajit Manocha told DIGITIMES that the semiconductor industry reached the US$1 trillion r…

Nvidia's AI Enterprise lists at $4,500 per GPU annually, and paid subscriptions add supported software, securi…

CoreWeave fell more than 25% this week, its debt yield briefly rose above 16% on Thursday, and SK Hynix droppe…

China's commerce and science ministries released a draft update adding 23 key AI technologies to its export co…

Anthropic told investors this week that it is making 85% gross margins, a figure the columnist calls a cash co…
