
What happened
A structured 10-week learning plan with 50 sessions teaches AI engineers how to build, deploy, and optimize inference services for large language models, covering topics from the roofline model and vLLM to load testing at 1,000+ concurrent requests and building a reproducible benchmark published on GitHub.
Why it matters
Most AI engineers lack a systematic path to production-grade inference work; this roadmap bridges theory and hands-on practice, showing how to measure performance (TTFT, inter-token latency, throughput, queue depth) and tune for cost and latency rather than jumping straight to deep learning or model selection, which often wastes effort.
What to watch
The roadmap also surfaces a broader principle—ML systems should evolve through phases starting with non-ML baselines (rules, heuristics) before adding simple models (logistic regression, decision trees), then tuning features and hyperparameters, and only then moving to complex deep learning—encouraging teams to validate each stage before scaling complexity.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The newsletter addresses a critical gap in AI engineering: most engineers know how to train models, but far fewer know how to deploy them efficiently at scale. The 10-week roadmap tackles this by grounding the curriculum in observable, measurable outcomes—throughput, latency percentiles (p50, p95, p99), queue depth—rather than abstract best practices. It codifies the hard-won lessons of inference optimization: that decoding is memory-bound (not compute-bound), that prefix caching and continuous batching unlock real savings, and that speculative decoding has known limits.
The plan also embeds a second, quieter lesson about agent design and general ML systems. The comparison between ReAct and Plan-and-Act shows that a poorly designed harness—one that accumulates failed context—can hurt performance more than no planner at all (20.60% vs. 36.97%). This echoes the phased ML development framework: starting simple, validating incrementally, and resisting the urge to add complexity until earlier stages are exhausted. A well-tuned logistic regression often outperforms a hastily trained neural network, and a naively finetuned planner can drag down a competent executor. The lesson is consistent: engineering discipline and measurement beat raw model power.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick: one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Security researcher Rowan Howard-Jones says OpenAI agents scanned the UN Conference on Trade and Development's…

On Weekend Update, host Michael Che described Dario Amodei as having 'stumbled through a press tour' agreeing…

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told CNN's Anderson Cooper AI safety is an engineering problem solved by more compute…

Microsoft released Copilot Managed Runtime in public preview, running apps built with Microsoft Copilot inside…

OpenAI's Head of Applied Research, Boris Power, said 80 to 90 percent of the company's research goes toward GP…

Researchers from Stanford and Caltech built HomeBody, letting a Unitree G1 robot autonomously navigate an unfa…
