AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryTHE DECODERPublished: Oct 24, 2026, 06:01 JST

Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.1 Pro hits 55 points, fourth overall

Send on LINE
Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.1 Pro hits 55 points, fourth overall

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Moonshot AI released Kimi K3.1 Pro, a post-trained upgrade to Kimi K3 that scores 55 points on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — an 11-point jump that puts it fourth, behind Claude Opus 5.5 (58) and two models at 56.

  2. Why it matters

    At 55 points, K3.1 Pro sits just 3 points behind the top proprietary models, a much narrower gap than its predecessor K3 managed — suggesting a Chinese open-weights model can now roughly match the leading closed systems on this index.

  3. What to watch

    Moonshot plans to release the model weights by November 4, 2026, which would make K3.1 Pro the highest-scoring open-weights model available.

WHO IT HITSEnterprise teams choosing between open-weights and proprietary AI models may see a much smaller quality gap, and developers building agentic or coding tools get a lower-cost option priced at $2 per million input tokens.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

Moonshot AI's K3.1 Pro is a post-trained version of Kimi K3, meaning the company spent significantly more compute refining the model after its initial training rather than building a larger base model. The result is a jump of 11 points on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, moving from a mid-pack position to fourth place overall. The strongest gains appear in agentic tasks: on GDPval-AA the model reaches 1,846 Elo, 312 points above K3, and on Terminal-Bench 4.0 it scores 65.7 percent versus K3's 13 percent.

The model keeps the same dimensions as K3 — 2.8 trillion total parameters and 104 billion active ones — while token prices drop by 33 percent. According to Artificial Analysis, it sits at the top of the Pareto frontier, with no model of comparable parameter count scoring higher on the Intelligence Index.

Moonshot also describes deliberate limits on offensive cyber capabilities. It says vulnerability research capabilities grew as post-training scaled up, so for the open-weights release it stripped cyber-related data from both training phases. On its internal xdev-bench-hard, the uncleaned version solves 90.5 percent of tasks, while K3.1 Pro solves 81.0 percent. Moonshot says no open-weights model should push the absolute frontier of offensive cyber capabilities.

FAQ
How much does Kimi K3.1 Pro cost?
Input costs $2 per million tokens, output $10 per million tokens, and cache hits $0.20 per million tokens — a 33 percent price drop from K3.
What is the Highspeed variant?
Moonshot is also shipping K3.1 Pro Highspeed, which runs two to three times faster and costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens. Both are available now through Kimi.ai, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, and the Kimi API.
How does it perform on agentic tasks?
On GDPval-AA it reaches 1,846 Elo, 312 points above K3 and just behind Claude Opus 5.5 (1,866). On Terminal-Bench 4.0 it scores 65.7 percent, barely behind Claude Opus 5.5 (66.4 percent).
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleInduction AI busts benchmark cache with trial-id tool