AIToday
AI Business & IndustryFortune AIPublished: Sep 26, 2026, 01:00 JST

Fed's Tom Barkin: 'AI apocalypse' has not arrived

Send on LINE
Fed's Tom Barkin: 'AI apocalypse' has not arrived

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin said the 'AI apocalypse' hasn't arrived, noting companies are spending on AI for productivity but strong earnings deter layoffs.

  2. Why it matters

    The economy is in an enormous AI investment cycle, Barkin said, yet firms are redeploying freed-up capacity rather than cutting headcount, so the feared mass job losses haven't materialized.

  3. What to watch

    The key obstacle is organizational, not technological—companies see task-level efficiency gains but haven't redesigned staffing models, Barkin said, citing auto mechanics as one area where AI could help less-experienced workers.

WHO IT HITSCorporate finance chiefs and workforce planners may find their task-level AI efficiency gains are not yet translating into headcount decisions, as Barkin's remarks suggest many firms remain uncertain how to redesign roles around AI.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

Barkin's remarks come as the Federal Reserve has moved back toward higher rates because inflation has proved more persistent than policymakers expected. He noted that six months ago it was easier to argue inflation's persistence was temporary, and that oil prices, tariffs and the AI buildout would eventually morph away. Now, with persistent tariff costs, higher gasoline prices and a huge wave of AI investment pushing up prices for some technology equipment, Barkin said inflation looks like it has been here for a while. He described the job inherited by Kevin Warsh with a log flume metaphor, capturing the bind of moving back toward higher rates while an enormous wave of AI investment reshapes prices and the labor market.

On AI itself, Barkin said the technology is already being used for coding, call centers, compliance paperwork and engineering. But he also offered a less obvious possibility: AI could make it easier to bring inexperienced workers into skilled trades, citing auto mechanics as an example where an AI assistant could give a less-experienced worker a real-time checklist. He said he's hearing a lot less fervency in the conviction that the AI apocalypse is coming than there was six months ago.

The stakes hinge on whether companies can translate task-level AI efficiency into redesigned staffing models, and on whether strong earnings continue to deter layoffs. For finance chiefs and workforce planners, the question may be less about replacing workers wholesale and more about how to reorganize tasks and roles as AI adoption spreads—an organizational challenge that Barkin suggests remains largely unresolved.

FAQ
What did Tom Barkin say about the 'AI apocalypse'?
Barkin said, 'I think there's a lot of talk about the AI apocalypse. We're clearly not yet there.'
Why aren't companies cutting jobs despite AI investment?
Barkin said strong corporate earnings and deep backlogs of technology projects make companies prefer to redeploy freed-up capacity rather than cut headcount.
What is the harder problem Barkin identified with AI?
Barkin said the harder problem is organizational: the unit of an AI-enabled task is not the same as a mid-level manager, and firms haven't figured out how to translate task efficiency into a redesigned staffing model.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleSanders and Casar file Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act; MIRI backs it