AIToday
AI Stocks & MarketsAI Business & IndustryTomasz Tunguz (Theory Ventures)Published: Oct 22, 2026, 04:00 JST

GPU pricing ladder spans $38.00 to $2.44 per card-hour

Send on LINE
GPU pricing ladder spans $38.00 to $2.44 per card-hour

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Tom Tunguz laid out a GPU pricing ladder from DeepSeek's theoretical $38.00 per card-hour maximum down to SpaceX's realized $2.44, with B200 spot at $8.77 and SpaceX's negotiated price at $5.27.

  2. Why it matters

    The gap between theoretical and realized revenue suggests inference businesses can be healthy even at current prices and efficiencies, with room to climb if demand persists at higher prices per card-hour.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The pricing ladder is built from two disclosures: SpaceX's third-quarter report and DeepSeek's inference post. DeepSeek's $38.00 figure is a theoretical maximum that assumes optimal conditions and full list price, while SpaceX's $2.44 realized revenue reflects operations costs, training, and unusable or unbillable work. Between those extremes sit the B200 spot price of $8.77 and SpaceX's negotiated $5.27.

The case for healthy inference economics rests on demand persisting and efficiency outrunning price cuts. The forces pushing the other way are considerable: GPU rental prices doubled in six months, from $4.40 to $8.08 per card hour, while the price of intelligence fell much faster, with OpenAI cutting Luna 80% in July and another 50% in September. A benchmark threshold that cost $0.55 eighteen months ago now clears at $0.0015, a 377-fold reduction.

The second force moves inference off the datacenter altogether. AI companies are asking Qualcomm to run large models on the handset itself, with Cristiano Amon, CEO of Qualcomm, saying on the Sources podcast that some at the forefront of AI want a hundred billion parameter model running on a phone by 2028. But the cloud is not big enough to support demand, and new data centers are behind schedule, with GPUs sitting idle on warehouse floors waiting for power. JPMorgan finds that more than 60% of the data center capacity planned for 2027 is not yet under construction, and a further 7% is delayed. With demand continuing to drive record revenue growth for AI, the deflationary forces may succumb to too much demand, and token factories benefit from more rungs to climb on the pricing ladder.

FAQ
What does the $38.00 theoretical maximum from DeepSeek represent?
It is a company claim for a GPU running under optimal conditions: maximum utilization for external customers, 100% of output usable and billable, sold at full list price.
Why is SpaceX's realized revenue per card-hour lower than its negotiated price?
SpaceX's $2.44 realized revenue includes operations costs, training, and unusable or unbillable work, while its $5.27 negotiated price is implied from its S-1.
What is the payback claim cited?
Bret Johnsen, CFO of SpaceX, said on the Q3 2026 earnings call that at current pricing, new compute deployments are generating a payback of less than a year.
Tomasz Tunguz (Theory Ventures)Read Original Article
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleHassabis cuts AGI timeline to two to three years