AIToday
Large Language ModelsTHE DECODERPublished: Oct 12, 2026, 19:01 JST

AlphaProof Nexus solves nine of 353 open Erdős problems

AlphaProof Nexus solves nine of 353 open Erdős problems

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    AlphaProof Nexus cracked nine of 353 open Erdős problems, two unsolved for 56 years, and proved 44 conjectures from the OEIS integer sequence database, per a study in Science.

  2. Why it matters

    The system solved dozens of open math problems on its own, and its results were peer reviewed, a notable step for AI-generated mathematical proofs.

WHO IT HITSThis lands on mathematics researchers and journal editors, who may face a growing flow of AI-generated proofs that need verification and peer review.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The publication of this study in Science sets it apart from recent AI math announcements that skipped formal review. OpenAI recently dumped hundreds of AI proofs on GitHub instead of submitting them to journals, prompting the Association for Human Mathematics, led by Terence Tao, to call for a boycott. Deepmind instead put its work through peer review. The system itself is built around Gemini 3.1 Pro, which drafts and revises proofs in the formal language Lean; Lean checks each draft after every edit, and error messages guide the next attempt. For harder sub-problems, it can call on AlphaProof, a specialized proof tool, though even without AlphaProof it solved the nine Erdős problems, Google Deepmind reports. Beyond the Erdős problems, the system proved 44 conjectures from the OEIS integer sequence database, solved an open question in algebraic geometry, and improved a known bound in min-max optimization, a technique used to train some AI models.

FAQ
How many Erdős problems did AlphaProof Nexus solve?
It cracked nine of 353 open Erdős problems, two of which had been unsolved for 56 years.
What else did the system prove?
It proved 44 conjectures from the OEIS integer sequence database, solved an open question in algebraic geometry, and improved a known bound in min-max optimization.
Was the work peer reviewed?
Yes, the study was published in Science and the work went through peer review.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAdobe and Echigo Tokimeki Railway teach safe trainspotting with AI editing