
What happened
Mastercard launched Agent Connect and expanded its Agent Suite for Merchants to support trusted agentic transactions, while Visa released research finding only 23% of U.S. consumers trust generative AI to handle payments.
Why it matters
The products aim to address concerns that AI agents may go outside their instructions, and the low trust level Visa found suggests adoption could hinge on making agent identity and authorization transparent to wary consumers.
What to watch
The know-your-agent framework Mastercard, Visa and Ant International are building must still preserve each network's own verification and decisioning processes, and it remains unclear how agent mistakes will be attributed.
WHO IT HITSMerchants and payment processors integrating AI shopping agents will need to decide which agent experiences to connect with while keeping control over pricing and fulfillment, and banks may face pressure to define liability when an agent buys the wrong thing.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The push into agentic commerce comes as payment companies try to address concerns that AI agents might act outside their instructions. Mastercard's response has been concrete: Agent Connect and an expanded Agent Suite for Merchants are meant to give businesses a way to support agentic shopping and make products discoverable across AI ecosystems, while a separate product, Agent Pay, uses Verifiable Intent to bind an agent's actions to what the user actually authorized.
Visa has taken a parallel path, releasing research in early September that found only 23% of U.S. consumers trust generative AI to handle payments on their behalf, and offering its own tools such as Trusted Agent Protocol and Intelligent Commerce Connect. Both card networks are now also collaborating with Ant International on a know-your-agent framework designed to trace agents back to a validated operator and assess them against security and behavioral requirements.
Not everyone thinks identity checks alone will be enough. Louis Hoch, CEO of payments company Usio, argues that knowing an agent is legitimate does not guarantee it is doing what the customer asked, and suggests a separate digital wallet for AI agents with a set spending limit as one option. How quickly agentic commerce scales may therefore hinge less on whether agents can be identified and more on whether merchants, banks and consumers get clear answers on spending limits, real-time shutoff, and who is responsible when an agent buys the wrong thing.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
ServiceNow introduced AI Control Tower, Context Engine, and Shift Zero, tools for managing AI agent access, id…

At an IMTS media panel in Chicago, Honeywell Technologies CTO Mehul Patel predicted companies will eventually…

On Sept. 1, Deere introduced JD, an AI assistant in its operations center that lets farmers ask about their ow…

Morgan Stanley analyst Matthew Cost began covering Booking Holdings with an Overweight rating and a $230 price…

CEO Jim Taiclet told a Morgan Stanley panel Lockheed will pair the F-35 and advanced missiles with cheaper aut…

Lockheed Martin completed a Riyadh summer internship for Saudi university students in AI, robotics and advance…
